On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 2:41 PM, Amit Kucheria <amit.kuche...@linaro.org> wrote: > On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 7:14 PM, Dechesne, Nicolas <n-deche...@ti.com> wrote: >> >> >> On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 5:59 PM, Andy Green <andy.gr...@linaro.org> wrote: >>> >>> Amit, do you know of a good place to raid for better cpuidle, closer to >>> upstream than OZ? >> >> >> wasn't that merged in 3.2? are you looking for that : >> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git;a=commit;h=9827266 > > What was merged depends on hotplug, it isn't SMP cpuidle. At this > point, I'm quite confused about the history on what happened to the > SMP cpuidle driver and why it wasn't merged. Mike or Kevin should > know.
Amit is correct. The hotplug-dependent cpuidle got merged. The SMP CPUidle patches have been put on the list and should work patch into a recent kernel: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ports.tegra/2649 However the OMAP4 support seems to be missing: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ports.arm.omap/69186 So this isn't straightforward, but at least it's headed in the right direction. Regards, Mike _______________________________________________ linaro-dev mailing list linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev
