On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 6:10 AM, Amit Kucheria <amit.kuche...@linaro.org> wrote: > On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 9:08 AM, Ricardo Salveti >> So in the end we'd be generating 2 sets of hwpacks per board, one >> based on the Development Overlay (latest components, even if not >> working properly), and one based on the Stable PPAs, that we know >> it'll always have a better enablement. Both would be using the same >> rootfs, as all distro related core changes will be part of the Overlay >> PPA anyway. >> >> I believe this can simply things a bit, and would not consume much of >> our time as the stable repository would just be a snapshot of a known >> to be working development PPA. > > What would the monthly release be based on? The stable PPA?
We'd be producing the release based on both the stable and dev/unstable PPA. Stable for users that just want to have the latest userspace working with an enabled kernel, and unstable for brave users and linaro developers that are mainly concerned about upstream support and enablement there. Cheers, -- Ricardo Salveti de Araujo _______________________________________________ linaro-dev mailing list linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev
