On 17 May 2012 01:35, Paul Larson <paul.lar...@linaro.org> wrote: > On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 1:43 AM, Harsh Prateek Bora <harsh.b...@linaro.org > > wrote: > >> >> >> On 16 May 2012 09:38, Paul Larson <paul.lar...@linaro.org> wrote: >> >>> On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 4:24 PM, Tom Gall <tom.g...@linaro.org> wrote: >>> >>>> HI Paul, >>>> >>>> On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 4:14 PM, Paul Larson <paul.lar...@linaro.org> >>>> wrote: >>>> > Cool, does this replace the existing e2daudiotest I guess? >>>> >>>> Please consider it as complementary. >>>> >>>> Ah, I see after looking at it a bit more. This one isn't completely >>> automated and requires someone to listen to the sound :) >>> >> >> Yes, Its the initial phase and therefore will evolve with time as >> required. We may want to plug-in e2eaudiotest and others if already >> available. >> As of now, it frees the user from finding out the card, device info for >> each audio playback/recording device on supported hardware and can help in >> identify issues where audio is almost ok, but not truly perfect (like >> choppy audio). Un-attended tests may treat imperfect audio as bad as no >> audio. I hope I am able to convey what I intend to do so. >> >> Ah, so if e2eaudiotest is plugged into it, it could act as a sort of > front-end for running it and making sure that the right audio device is set > up for that particular board? So in this way, it could allow for automated > tests, not just interactive ones? >
Yes, we can add more as well ! regards, Harsh > > Thanks, > Paul Larson >
_______________________________________________ linaro-dev mailing list linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev
