On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 9:25 AM, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) <t...@linaro.org> wrote: > On Fri, 2012-06-08 at 08:15 -0600, John Rigby wrote: >> On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 7:07 AM, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) <t...@linaro.org> wrote: > >> > Now, if the Ubuntu kernel packaging scripts could gain an option to >> > generate a config from these fragments... :-) >> > >> That will happen soon. > > I should point out that at the moment we don't have config fragments for > panda or snowball, and I don't know if the other teams are going to get > involved. If it is difficult making config fragment use optional, I > could reverse engineer fragments for these boards from the current > configs used for Ubuntu. (I am assuming that configs are currently hard > coded in the kernel packaging scripts and not generated from another > source?)
For lt kernels we get configs from the here: http://git.linaro.org/gitweb?p=people/jcrigby/linux-lt-ci-pack-info.git;a=heads I intend to ignore those in the new scripts if the config fragments exist so we can support both methods at first until we get config fragments for all kernels. For non lt kernels the configs are in the packaging. This bad to have linux-linaro work differently that lt and I will be making all things the same soon. --john > > -- > Tixy > _______________________________________________ linaro-dev mailing list linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev
