On 13 June 2012 10:50, Jean Pihet <jean.pi...@newoldbits.com> wrote: > Hi Vincent, > > On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 2:02 PM, Vincent Guittot > <vincent.guit...@linaro.org> wrote: >> Add infrastructure to be able to modify the cpu_power of each core >> >> Signed-off-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guit...@linaro.org> >> --- >> arch/arm/include/asm/topology.h | 2 ++ >> arch/arm/kernel/topology.c | 36 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- >> 2 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/topology.h >> b/arch/arm/include/asm/topology.h >> index 58b8b84..78e4c85 100644 >> --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/topology.h >> +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/topology.h >> @@ -27,11 +27,13 @@ void init_cpu_topology(void); >> void store_cpu_topology(unsigned int cpuid); >> const struct cpumask *cpu_coregroup_mask(int cpu); >> >> +void set_power_scale(unsigned int cpu, unsigned long power); >> #else >> >> static inline void init_cpu_topology(void) { } >> static inline void store_cpu_topology(unsigned int cpuid) { } >> >> +static inline void set_power_scale(unsigned int cpu, unsigned long power) { >> } >> #endif >> >> #include <asm-generic/topology.h> >> diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/topology.c b/arch/arm/kernel/topology.c >> index 8200dea..00301a7 100644 >> --- a/arch/arm/kernel/topology.c >> +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/topology.c >> @@ -22,6 +22,35 @@ >> #include <asm/cputype.h> >> #include <asm/topology.h> >> >> +/* >> + * cpu power scale management >> + */ >> + >> +/* >> + * cpu power table >> + * This per cpu data structure describes the relative capacity of each core. >> + * On a heteregenous system, cores don't have the same computation capacity >> + * and we reflect that difference in the cpu_power field so the scheduler >> can >> + * take this difference into account for load balance. A per cpu structure >> is >> + * preferred because each cpu is mainly using its own cpu_power even it's >> not >> + * always true because of nohz_idle_balance > The end of the comment is unclear IMO; Can you give more details on > the relation between cpu_power and nohz_idle_balance?
When several cores are idle, one core runs the load balance for all idle cores. The update of the cpu_power can be done during rebalance and arch_scale_freq_power can be called by CPU0 for updating the cpu_power of CPU1. I was probably not clear enough in my first explanation. I will reword the comment Regards, Vincent > > Regards, > Jean _______________________________________________ linaro-dev mailing list linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev