Unfortunately, not as easy as it sounds. We'd have to actually change the dispatcher to intercept submissions to vexpress, and then re-route them to vexpress-a9, because we can'\t have two device instances talking to the same device. I'll look into it, but it would be quite a nasty bodge.
Dave On 24 Sep 2012, at 10:23, Alexander Sack wrote: > could we keep deprecated backward compatibility mapping on LAVA side for a > while? > > On Sep 24, 2012 10:01 AM, "Paul Sokolovsky" <paul.sokolov...@linaro.org> > wrote: > Hello, > > On Mon, 24 Sep 2012 08:30:34 +0100 > Dave Pigott <dave.pig...@linaro.org> wrote: > > > Hi All, > > > > I notice that there are still some jobs being submitted to LAVA with > > the device-type "vexpress". This device type is now deprecated and > > has been replaced by the more specific device type vexpress-a9. The > > jobs seem to be coming from CI and Android. Could someone amend these > > submissions? > > Tracked as https://bugs.launchpad.net/linaro-ci/+bug/1055354 (Critical). > > > > > Thanks > > > > Dave > > > -- > Best Regards, > Paul > > Linaro.org | Open source software for ARM SoCs > Follow Linaro: http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro > http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg - http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog > > _______________________________________________ > linaro-validation mailing list > linaro-validat...@lists.linaro.org > http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-validation
_______________________________________________ linaro-dev mailing list linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev
