On Thu, 2012-12-13 at 22:25 +0800, Alex Shi wrote: > On 12/13/2012 06:11 PM, Vincent Guittot wrote: > > On 13 December 2012 03:17, Alex Shi <alex....@intel.com> wrote: > >> On 12/12/2012 09:31 PM, Vincent Guittot wrote: > >>> During the creation of sched_domain, we define a pack buddy CPU for each > >>> CPU > >>> when one is available. We want to pack at all levels where a group of CPU > >>> can > >>> be power gated independently from others. > >>> On a system that can't power gate a group of CPUs independently, the flag > >>> is > >>> set at all sched_domain level and the buddy is set to -1. This is the > >>> default > >>> behavior. > >>> On a dual clusters / dual cores system which can power gate each core and > >>> cluster independently, the buddy configuration will be : > >>> > >>> | Cluster 0 | Cluster 1 | > >>> | CPU0 | CPU1 | CPU2 | CPU3 | > >>> ----------------------------------- > >>> buddy | CPU0 | CPU0 | CPU0 | CPU2 | > >>> > >>> Small tasks tend to slip out of the periodic load balance so the best > >>> place > >>> to choose to migrate them is during their wake up. The decision is in > >>> O(1) as > >>> we only check again one buddy CPU > >> > >> Just have a little worry about the scalability on a big machine, like on > >> a 4 sockets NUMA machine * 8 cores * HT machine, the buddy cpu in whole > >> system need care 64 LCPUs. and in your case cpu0 just care 4 LCPU. That > >> is different on task distribution decision. > > > > The buddy CPU should probably not be the same for all 64 LCPU it > > depends on where it's worth packing small tasks > > Do you have further ideas for buddy cpu on such example? > > > > Which kind of sched_domain configuration have you for such system ? > > and how many sched_domain level have you ? > > it is general X86 domain configuration. with 4 levels, > sibling/core/cpu/numa.
CPU is a bug that slipped into domain degeneration. You should have SIBLING/MC/NUMA (chasing that down is on todo). -Mike _______________________________________________ linaro-dev mailing list linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev
