Hi,
On 17 June 2014 16:41, Fathi Boudra <fathi.bou...@linaro.org> wrote: > Vishal, > > 1. against which tree should it be applied? > I have tested it against TC2 with the LSK tree. I was not sure if the patches directly go to LSK. I thought it should first go into config fragment tree. > 2. do you want it enabled by default for all android builds? > Moving ahead SELinux is mandatory for Android so it needs to be enabled across all the platforms we care for. Linux-linaro and LSK are validated on VExpress platform so I am enabling the userspace bits for VExpress to start with. > > On 17 June 2014 13:57, Vishal Bhoj <vishal.b...@linaro.org> wrote: > > From: Vishal Bhoj <vishal.b...@linaro.org> > > > > Signed-off-by: Vishal Bhoj <vishal.b...@linaro.org> > > --- > > linaro/configs/android.conf | 10 ++++++++++ > > 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/linaro/configs/android.conf b/linaro/configs/android.conf > > index e4fd1ad..50e8ac2 100644 > > --- a/linaro/configs/android.conf > > +++ b/linaro/configs/android.conf > > @@ -40,3 +40,13 @@ CONFIG_ADF_FBDEV=y > > CONFIG_ADF_MEMBLOCK=y > > CONFIG_DMA_SHARED_BUFFER=y > > CONFIG_TUN=y > > +CONFIG_AUDIT=y > > +CONFIG_NF_CONNTRACK_SECMARK=y > > +CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_TARGET_CONNSECMARK=y > > +CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_TARGET_SECMARK=y > > +CONFIG_IP_NF_SECURITY=y > > +CONFIG_SECURITY=y > > +CONFIG_SECURITY_NETWORK=y > > +CONFIG_LSM_MMAP_MIN_ADDR=4096 > > +CONFIG_SECURITY_SELINUX=y > > +CONFIG_EXT4_FS_SECURITY=y > > -- > > 1.9.1 > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > linaro-dev mailing list > > linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org > > http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev >
_______________________________________________ linaro-dev mailing list linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev
