On Fri, 12 Aug 2011 10:24:57 -0600, Joey Stanford <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi TLs and PMs, > > As we think through the delivery of monthly milestones and their > affect on status.linaro.org it's become very apparent that WIs should > /not/ span months. Instead they should exist on a BP you intend to > deliver in one month. If you have a piece of work that will span > multiple months then it should be multiple BPs (i.e. one BP per month, > not two months working on one BP). If you think you'll span months, > please split the work into (minimally) one month chunks as BPs. > > This allows us to use the LP milestone view and not spend time > updating status.l.o with essentially duplicate functionality. It also > allows us to spend more time improving the "card view" (Roadmap item > completion). Additionally it allows us to better communicate > success/failure to the TSC (we're delivering something that someone > could attempt to use vs some obscure subset of WIs). And lastly, > it's just plain easier for you to manage a single BP per month than > WIs from several BPs spanned across multiple months. > > Please take this under consideration for your September (and beyond) > planning. You do not have to make any adjustments to August. Yes, > sometimes you may have to make hard choices initially as to what goes > into one or more BPs on a given month. This will get easier over time > as we all adjust to the cadence.
Do you have any ideas about what the process should be for workitems that aren't complete by that monthly milestone? Does it make a difference to that process if those workitems are required for acceptance of the blueprint? Thanks, James _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~linaro-project-management Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~linaro-project-management More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
