Ok, sold. Let's give a try for only wayward health checks then. If it doesn't work we'll do something different.
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 2:58 PM, James Westby <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, 31 Aug 2011 14:13:48 -0600, Joey Stanford <[email protected]> wrote: >> > I do wonder if we need to highlight "it's ok", or if we would rather >> > just have "there's a problem" here noted. >> >> Good question. Let me answer that with a question. >> >> Would you rather assume that all cards are healthy unless otherwise >> noted, or, would rather that we didn't assume. > > Allow me to answer with another question... > > When does this chain ever stop? :-) > > I think that assuming things are healthy is good because: > > 1. It doesn't highlight "everything is ok", as that should be the > common state. > > 2. It likely makes problems more visually distinctive. > > As for the implementation, I don't think it makes a difference, > though I would err on the side of having to deal with fewer icons. I'm > more bringing this up as I think it's likely a better UI, rather than > implementation concerns. > > The answer is likely to implement both and then decide (or perhaps just > doctor screenshots once we have the basic card display in place, and > decide based on those, as that's almost as good.) > > Thanks, > > James > _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~linaro-project-management Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~linaro-project-management More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
