We should only enforce it if it brings a substantial benefit, and then only by automation.
Every rule has a cost associated. The cost is proportional to the number of people who has to deal with the rules. From a human perspective I see no need for a naming convention. You filter on Milestone or Series to see what's interesting. Searching in the lp search dialog is done on content, I don't know how to search on name anyway. 1 → 20 of 45200 other pages matching "linaro-android" Killing obsolete wiki pages is very important. /Tony On 26 September 2011 15:53, Fathi Boudra <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > We have this wiki page about blueprints naming conventions: > https://wiki.linaro.org/Process/Blueprints/NamingConventions > > Current teams practices don't follow these conventions anymore. > Could we officially state these naming conventions as obsolete > and kill the related wiki pages to avoid confusion? > > Otherwise, we need to enforce this policy and make sure that > the blueprints writers use the same naming conventions. > > Opinions? > > Cheers, > -- > Fathi Boudra > Linaro Release Manager | Validation Project Manager > Linaro.org | Open source software for ARM SoCs > > _______________________________________________ > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~linaro-project-management > Post to : [email protected] > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~linaro-project-management > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp > _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~linaro-project-management Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~linaro-project-management More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

