On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 3:34 PM, Christian Robottom Reis <[email protected]>wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 07, 2012 at 10:29:44AM -0600, Mounir Bsaibes wrote: > > Sometimes some of the acceptance criteria is met, but not all. > > In that case, I added a sub-section in the closeout section called " > > proposal for future development" > > That's fine. But Joey's main point is that there are cards that are > called "complete" which aren't being tested for validation criteria /by > the PM himself/. If the PM or someone other than the tech lead/developer > can't verify the AC, then you can't really be confident it was done. > Agreed. One of my lessons learned for this quarter is to have a Work item for each Acceptance Criteria specifically spelled out in a blueprint to make sure each acceptance criteria is covered. Additionally, we should verify it. > -- > Christian Robottom Reis, Engineering VP > Brazil (GMT-3) | [+55] 16 9112 6430 | [+1] 612 216 4935 > Linaro.org: Open Source Software for ARM SoCs > -- Mounir Bsaibes Project Manager Follow Linaro.org: facebook.com/pages/Linaro/155974581091106 http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog <http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog>
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~linaro-project-management Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~linaro-project-management More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
