On 26 November 2012 16:56, Jakub Pavelek <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 26 November 2012 13:06, Alexander Sack <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 11:47 AM, Jakub Pavelek >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> > On 26 November 2012 10:35, Fathi Boudra <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> >> On 26 November 2012 11:29, Alexander Sack <[email protected]> >> >> wrote: >> >> > On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 10:20 PM, Deepak Saxena <[email protected]> >> >> > wrote: >> >> >> On 22 October 2012 04:30, Alexander Sack <[email protected]> >> >> >> wrote: >> >> >>> On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 12:23 PM, Fathi Boudra >> >> >>> <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >>>> Hi TLs/PMs, >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> The initial wiki page for the cycle highlights is online: >> >> >>>> https://wiki.linaro.org/Cycles/1210/Release/Highlights >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> The initial page is auto-generated, based on the headline of the >> >> >>>> implemented blueprints targeted for this development cycle. >> >> >>>> The wiki page is mostly empty as *4* blueprints on *72* have been >> >> >>>> implemented. >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> Please, update the blueprints status and/or fill your respective >> >> >>>> section ASAP. >> >> >>>> Thanks in advance for your help. >> >> >>> >> >> >>> Amitk had the idea to get all the work items completed on all >> >> >>> blueprints included in the initial higlights page and then have him >> >> >>> hand edit based off that... >> >> >>> >> >> >>> Can we try that next month? >> >> >>> >> >> >>> From what I understand Amitk would have to move DONE work items to >> >> >>> a >> >> >>> Work Items (milestone): section in order to make it possible for us >> >> >>> to >> >> >>> extract that info automatically for him, right? Amit, does that >> >> >>> sound >> >> >>> reasonable to try out next month for PM blueprints? >> >> >> >> >> >> +1, would love to see this happen for KWG BPs too. >> >> > >> >> > Fathi: are we getting this info for kernel and power preseeded on >> >> > highlight for manual editing this month? >> >> >> >> I was writing the call for contribution mail right now. >> >> Highlights wiki page is already up-to-date. >> > >> > >> > It seems to be really picky, took only two work items :( >> >> I guess if you go to your engineers and fix the WI section to better >> reflect what was done for this month, Fathi would be willing to rerun >> his script and update the highlights section to give you a better >> start to edit :) > > > The WI sections for KWG blueprints seem to be reflecting what was done just > fine, yet almost none were picked by the scripting, like few examples: > https://blueprints.launchpad.net/linux-linaro/+spec/android-lowmem-upstreaming > https://blueprints.launchpad.net/linux-linaro/+spec/android-keyreset-upstreaming > should have been picked. > > I think the issue is the formulation of "targeted to this cycle" - in KWG we > target typically upstream kernel releases, meaning our series are > upstreamlinux and our milestones are 3.7, 3.7 and 3.9. Looking at the items > picked for this month's highlights, only blueprints that are not > up-streaming work (like the one analyzing kernel size and writing a report) > got picked up.
The issue here is your new milestone naming scheme. You introduced a new serie/milestones breaking all tracking tools (including status.l.o). Last time you mentioned that changes, I recommended to discuss it with a larger attendance and send a mail to announce your intent to change the rules. It didn't happened, so I guess other things are broken. > Do we have similar situation in the Android team with nothing being > collected despite plenty of blueprints in 12.11? No, it's because we do that only for KWG/PMWG. On Android, regular rule applies: blueprint targeted to be delivered this cycle and implemented. _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~linaro-project-management Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~linaro-project-management More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
