On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 11:44 AM, Guilherme Salgado <[email protected]> wrote: > Hmm, my gut feeling is that the things we can do in parallel are fast > enough to not make a significant difference if we actually do run them > in parallel, but I'd like to be wrong there.
At least at my host system it takes a good amount of time to format and create the ext4 filesystem at my sd cards. And that's directly related with the size of the SD card that you're using, so with 8/16gb card it can save a good amount of time. I believe there are also some other areas to put in parallel, but would need to look into more details. I know Tom Gall did some optimizations in the past, maybe he knows how faster it was after applying his changes. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of linaro- infrastructure-drivers, which is the registrant for Linaro Image Tools. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/893104 Title: Execute parallel l-m-c actions where possible Status in Linaro Image Tools: New Bug description: Hi, This was brought up in a session at the last Connect. The request is to perform actions in parallel in linaro-media-create to shorten execution time. Thanks, Mattias To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/linaro-image-tools/+bug/893104/+subscriptions _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~linaro-release Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~linaro-release More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
