On 02/05/12 13:25, Mans Rullgard wrote: > On 2 May 2012 05:15, Michael Hope <michael.h...@linaro.org> wrote: >> On 27 April 2012 11:59, Michael Hope <michael.h...@linaro.org> wrote: >>> On 23 April 2012 14:23, Jon Masters <j...@redhat.com> wrote: >>>> On 04/22/2012 06:06 PM, Michael Hope wrote: >>>>> On 21 April 2012 09:10, Jon Masters <j...@redhat.com> wrote: >>>>>> Hey everyone, >>>>>> >>>>>> Following up here. Where do we stand? We need to have upstream patches >>>>>> before we can pull them into the distro - is that piece done? >>>>> >>>>> Hi Jon. I've been away, sorry. I've just sent the GCC patch and >>>>> Carlos is on the hook for the GLIBC side. >>>> >>>> I saw the email. Could folks do me a favor and let me know the moment >>>> this lands in upstream and I'll arrange for us to pull it immediately. >>>> >>>> (I'm on all the libc lists, but then I'm on almost every list, >>>> everywhere, so it takes a bit of time to get to it) >>> >>> Hi Jon. There's a fault with the GCC patch so it's still in progress. >>> Carlos sent the GLIBC patch out for review today. >> >> Hi Jon. The GCC patch is now upstream as r186859 and r187012. > > I noticed that it now sets the dynamic loader to /lib/ld-linux-armhf.so.3 > even when configured for soft-float ABI and linking against a soft-float > rootfs. The resulting binaries then fail to run. Passing -mfloat-abi=softfp > to the link command fixes it. Is this change in behaviour intentional? >
Eh? Exactly what command line did you invoke the compiler with, and what was the configuration? Are you sure you don't have a compiler configured to hard-float by default? R. _______________________________________________ linaro-toolchain mailing list linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-toolchain
