On 15 August 2012 22:38, Mans Rullgard <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 15 August 2012 17:17, Matthew Gretton-Dann
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> The performance of PGO on 'a popular embedded benchmark' is 14%
>> improvement, LTO is 7%.  Don't know both together, or SPEC.
>
> On 'a popular media coding library' PGO gains 2-5% in general, in one case
> as much as 11%.  The relative gains are larger on average with hand-written
> assembly disabled, but obviously nowhere near the performance with it enabled.
>
> On the same library LTO is 2-3.5 _times_ slower than without on all tests,
> although it does pass the test suite.

Sorry for crying wolf.  I redid the LTO build and the huge performance drop is
gone.  Now I'm getting minor gains on most tests and 5-8% loss on a few.  More
worrying is that it is now failing a few tests.  I'll look into both issues
and report back.

-- 
Mans Rullgard / mru

_______________________________________________
linaro-toolchain mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-toolchain

Reply via email to