>* Start analysis on jump threading in GCC.

What kind of analysis are you going to do?  I have some helpful hints dealing 
with the jump threading in VRP.  Really DOM should be removed fully as most if 
not all the other optimizers already do its job.  Also you should do this 
analysis on the GCC list right away because Jeff Law and Steven Bosscher can 
help you understand why things are done currently the way they are done.  

You will gain more optimizations improving VRP rather than improving jump 
threading in general.

Thanks,
Andrew Pinski
________________________________________
From: linaro-toolchain-boun...@lists.linaro.org 
[linaro-toolchain-boun...@lists.linaro.org] on behalf of Venkataramanan Kumar 
[venkataramanan.ku...@linaro.org]
Sent: Saturday, February 09, 2013 11:43 PM
To: linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org
Subject: [ACTIVITY] 4-8 Feb 2013

== Progress ==
* Implementing GC sections support in bintuils
  Looking at aarch64 relocations to consider while sweeping.

* Cbuild experiments to test gcc svn aarch64 4.7 branch.
  Connection problems to the cbuild machines are solved now.
  Thanks to Matt. Spawned the build.

Misc
------
* Attend tool chain weekly meet, and stand up call
*  Had a look at one x86_64 related patch that gone into GCC trunk.

== Next week ==
* Continue Implementing GC sections support in binutils.
* Start analysis on jump threading in GCC.

_______________________________________________
linaro-toolchain mailing list
linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org
http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-toolchain



_______________________________________________
linaro-toolchain mailing list
linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org
http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-toolchain

Reply via email to