Why not use perf instead of gprof? Perf works on ARM64 and I think on Juno already. It also easier to use gprof as you don't need to recompile.
Thanks, Andrew -----Original Message----- From: linaro-toolchain-boun...@lists.linaro.org [mailto:linaro-toolchain-boun...@lists.linaro.org] On Behalf Of Bernie Ogden Sent: Monday, December 15, 2014 7:57 AM To: Linaro ToolChain Subject: [ACTIVITY] 8th - 12th December ABE benchmarking - TCWG-360 [7/10] * Finished post-move LAVA lab workarounds * Should be flexible enough for TCWG lab too, but we'll see * Refactored sources - now more robust and maintainable lowlevellock.h comments - CARD-341 [1/10] * A further round of changes, got an OK Raised a bug on GCC re questionable generation of pow calls - TCWG-558 [0/10] * Upstream fixed it really fast Misc - [2/10] =Plan= Switch to TCWG Junos, perhaps start using gprof Think about where to go next with libm exercising Look though Will's single-thread performance patches Test benchmark repeatability Port benchmarking scripts to ABE repo Start on storage/automation, if Rob has time =Absences= On holiday Monday 22nd Dec to Friday 2nd Jan _______________________________________________ linaro-toolchain mailing list linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-toolchain _______________________________________________ linaro-toolchain mailing list linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-toolchain
