On 3 December 2015 at 16:46, Robert Schiele <rschi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Keeping linaro-toolchain in the loop.
>
> Robert
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Robert Schiele <rschi...@gmail.com>
> Date: Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 4:44 PM
> Subject: Re: Lost upstream patch in merge from gcc-5-branch to
> linaro/gcc-5-branch
> To: Yvan Roux <yvan.r...@linaro.org>
>
>
> Hi Yvan,
>
> On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 1:25 PM, Yvan Roux <yvan.r...@linaro.org> wrote:
>> This fix on gcc-5-branch doesn't apply on Linaro 5 branch, because we
>> have backported trunk revision 222624 (which renames maybe_fma to
>> coumpound_p) into it.  So, our branch as the same code as trunk one
>> regarding aarch64_rtx_costs.  Do you experiment any issues related to
>> this change ?
>
> No issues. This was just a theoretical thought and through our CI
> build I learned exactly what you just told me the hard way now.

Ok great.

> Sorry for the noise.

No problem, don't hesitate to report issues when you have some.

> Robert
> _______________________________________________
> linaro-toolchain mailing list
> linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org
> https://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-toolchain
_______________________________________________
linaro-toolchain mailing list
linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org
https://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-toolchain

Reply via email to