Hi!

When using the linaro-4.9-2015.05 toolchain on the Linux master and on Linux 
stable releases
I am seeing a build issue below when using the allyesconfig.  This does not 
seem to occur on the 5.2 tool chain.
We cannot move to 5.2 tool chain for our releases as they are based on 4.9. 

 LD      init/built-in.o
arch/arm/kernel/built-in.o:(.text.fixup+0x1d4): relocation truncated to fit: 
R_ARM_JUMP24 against `.text.unlikely'
arch/arm/kernel/built-in.o:(.text.fixup+0x1e0): relocation truncated to fit: 
R_ARM_JUMP24 against `.text.unlikely'
arch/arm/kernel/built-in.o:(.text.fixup+0x1ec): relocation truncated to fit: 
R_ARM_JUMP24 against `.text.unlikely'
drivers/built-in.o: In function `combiner_handle_cascade_irq':
:(.text+0x834): relocation truncated to fit: R_ARM_CALL against symbol 
`_raw_spin_lock' defined in .spinlock.text section in kernel/built-in.o
:(.text+0x868): relocation truncated to fit: R_ARM_CALL against symbol 
`_raw_spin_unlock' defined in .spinlock.text section in kernel/built-in.o
drivers/built-in.o: In function `hip04_irq_set_type':
:(.text+0xad0): relocation truncated to fit: R_ARM_CALL against symbol 
`_raw_spin_lock' defined in .spinlock.text section in kernel/built-in.o
:(.text+0xb10): relocation truncated to fit: R_ARM_CALL against symbol 
`_raw_spin_unlock' defined in .spinlock.text section in kernel/built-in.o
drivers/built-in.o: In function `hip04_raise_softirq':
:(.text+0xc8c): relocation truncated to fit: R_ARM_CALL against symbol 
`_raw_spin_lock_irqsave' defined in .spinlock.text section in kernel/built-in.o
:(.text+0xdc8): relocation truncated to fit: R_ARM_CALL against symbol 
`_raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore' defined in .spinlock.text section in 
kernel/built-in.o
drivers/built-in.o: In function `hip04_irq_set_affinity':
:(.text+0xefc): relocation truncated to fit: R_ARM_CALL against symbol 
`_raw_spin_lock' defined in .spinlock.text section in kernel/built-in.o
:(.text+0xf78): additional relocation overflows omitted from the output
make: *** [vmlinux] Error 1

Please advise to how to resolve this issue within the 4.9 Linaro tool chain

Dan

-- 
------------------
Dan Murphy

_______________________________________________
linaro-toolchain mailing list
linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org
https://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-toolchain

Reply via email to