Not big endian and LTO together that I know of, we have got quite a few bare-metal big-endian tests running on models though.
Peter On 24 May 2016 at 18:43, Renato Golin <renato.go...@linaro.org> wrote: > On 24 May 2016 at 18:13, Peter Smith <peter.sm...@linaro.org> wrote: >> I think that the bit missing from Gold is the endian reversal code for >> instructions, in ARMv7 BE8. If that is implemented then no additional >> support is needed for LTO. I would suspect that it would be much >> quicker to implement BE8 support in gold than write a ld LTO plugin. > > I remember some people not wanting to touch gold with a 10-foot pole, > but that might just have been my impression. > > I agree that adding BE8 to gold would be easier, but there's a > difference between "works on my box" and "Linaro has validated it". I > wouldn't want to claim the latter if we only do the former. > > >> Not that it is of much use to you, but ARM's proprietary toolchain >> supports LTO for bare-metal via clang, including v7a, and we (ARM) >> haven't seen any problems with code-generation due to LTO in the tests >> that we run. > > Big endian, too? _______________________________________________ linaro-toolchain mailing list linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org https://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-toolchain
