On 31 March 2012 06:43, Alexander Sack <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 10:08:27AM +0200, Le.chi Thu wrote: >> I found the problem. The init.rc in the ramdisk image (uInitrd) has >> changed. The lava-dispatcher patch the partition tables in the init.rc >> file. Now the partition tables have moved to the init.partitions.rc >> file and the init.rc import that file. >> > > We need to coordinate things better imo. AFAIK Zach and his team knew > that he was changing this file, so if he would have known that this > file change requires coordination with the LAVA team he probably would > have done that.
I would have given people a heads up, but I never would have expected LAVA to have a dependency on an init script. > May I propose to a list of the files we patch/touch and coordinate > with Zach so he can remember to coordinate with LAVA team such a > change? > > In this way we can avoid LAVA team finding out about this through job > bustage :). We can coordinate, but the fundamental issue is that LAVA should have these dependencies in the first place, it should treat the unit as a blackbox and be able to boot anything, in any configuration. > > -- > Alexander Sack <[email protected]> > Technical Director, Linaro Platform Teams > http://www.linaro.org | Open source software for ARM SoCs > http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg - http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog > -- Zach Pfeffer Android Platform Team Lead, Linaro Platform Teams Linaro.org | Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg - http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog _______________________________________________ linaro-validation mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-validation
