Deepti,
On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 2:32 PM, Deepti Kalakeri
<[email protected]> wrote:
> Hello Deepak/Andrey,
>
> Building the omap2 defconfig kernel for armhf instead of armel seemed to fix
> the omap2 defconfig boot issues previously mentioned in bug 972191.
> The omap2_defconfig builds boot fine on panda boards, but the kernel built
> is now failing to boot on beagle boards because of Kernel panic.
> The Kernel trace can be found in the log
> http://validation.linaro.org/lava-server/scheduler/job/21290/log_file#entry6.

This gives me a 404

> Here is the job which was
> https://ci.linaro.org/jenkins/job/linux-linaro-tracking_beagle-omap2plus/84/consoleFull.

This is a build log, not the the boot log. I followed the downstream
jobs without much success..
Any help on this ?
> Is this a known issue ?
>
>
> On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 7:57 AM, Deepak Saxena <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> On 11 May 2012 08:03, Andy Doan <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > +1 the LAVA team
>> >
>> >
>> > On 05/11/2012 06:56 AM, Deepti Kalakeri wrote:
>> >>
>> >> On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 4:19 PM, Venkatraman S <[email protected]
>> >> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>    Checked that log. The boot log seems to be okay from the kernel. The
>> >>    rootfs was mounted and fsck also succeeded.
>> >>
>> >>    2 interesting sections:-
>> >>
>> >>    1) mount: mounting udev on /dev failed: No such device
>> >>    W: devtmpfs not available, falling back to tmpfs for /dev
>> >>
>> >>    Do your scripts depend on udev ?
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Not my scripts, but I guess the linaro-media-create used on LAVA does.
>> >
>> >
>> > Here's is a link to the scheduler's view of this, which is a little
>> > easier
>> > to read and has details like the job time out.
>> >
>> >  http://validation.linaro.org/lava-server/scheduler/job/18287
>>
>> That still doesn't quite give me enough information. Both this and the
>> other log are confusing b/c as Venkat pointed out, it appears that the
>> kernel booted OK and mounted the rootfs. Is there a log of what
>> commands are actually run on the target with their respective outputs?
>>
>> ~Deepak
>
>
>
>
> --
> Thanks and Regards,
> Deepti
> Infrastructure Team Member, Linaro Platform Teams
> Linaro.org | Open source software for ARM SoCs
> Follow Linaro: http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro
> http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg - http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> linaro-kernel mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-kernel
>

_______________________________________________
linaro-validation mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-validation

Reply via email to