On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 05:07:14PM +1200, Michael Hudson-Doyle wrote:
> Those of you who have been around for a while will know that we used
> to package LAVA as Debian packages.  This had its problems and we
> switched over to the world of pip and virtualenv and
> lava-deployment-tool.
> 
> Unfortunately, pip and virtualenv have not really given us the control
> we need to be confident in our deployments, and so I'm proposing to
> change again, this time to zc.buildout.  This is less of a change than
> the switch away from debs -- instances of LAVA will still be a concept
> and the lava-deployment-tool script will still be used, at least for now.
> 
> The way buildout works is that there is a config file that specifies
> how -- reproducibly! -- to assemble various pieces into a deployment.
> I have a branch of lava-server at lp:~mwhudson/lava-server/use-buildout
> that contains such a config file (and various other related bits and
> pieces), and a branch of lava-deployment-tool that creates a
> buildout-based deployment.
> 
> An instance on disk in the new world is similar to but not the same as
> an instance is today.  In particular it is not a virtual environment
> -- although for compatibility, it looks like one.  There is still a
> $LAVA_INSTANCE/bin/activate script that you can source in bash to put
> that instance's scripts at the front of your $PATH.  Inside an
> instance, the etc, run, tmp and var directories server the same
> function as they do today.  There is also a new directory, code.  The
> code directory contains a number of subdirectories, one for each revno
> of lava-server that has been installed into that instance, and a
> symlink 'current' that points to the currently active one.
> 
> There are now two merge proposals on LP:
> 
> https://code.launchpad.net/~mwhudson/lava-server/use-buildout/+merge/109768
> https://code.launchpad.net/~mwhudson/lava-deployment-tool/use-buildout/+merge/109769
> 
> I've made an effort to update the documentation in l-d-t's README, and
> I've put an htmlified version of this file online at
> http://people.linaro.org/~mwh/ldt.html so that might be a good place
> to start.
> 
> Cheers,
> mwh
> 
> _______________________________________________
> linaro-validation mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-validation
> 

Hi Michael,

I am currently using virtualenv and pip manually to "deploy" lava-server
and lava-dashboard on my computer, so I can work on the Graphics
dashboard extension. I am not using l-d-t as it brings in too many
dependencies (databases etc) which I don't need (nor want) running on my
development box.

Will the change to zc.buildout affect this use case?

Thanks,
Alexandros

_______________________________________________
linaro-validation mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-validation

Reply via email to