Ricardo Salveti <[email protected]> writes:

> On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 6:31 PM, Michael Hudson-Doyle
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Ricardo Salveti <[email protected]> writes:
>>> As I believe this could also be related with the connection we have
>>> available at the lab, and as we're caching the tarballs already,
>>
>> Heh well.  Two points:
>>
>> (a) we only cache the boot and rootfs tarballs currently.  I doubt zsync
>>    will help there -- surely we'd need to keep the image around for
>>    that?
>
> I believe so, at least it'd be easier for zsync to understand.
>
>>> wouldn't it be possible to use zsync or a similar tool to speed up the
>>> download?
>>>
>>> For the pre-built images we're already generating the zsync meta-data
>>> file together with the image itself, so would be nice to check if that
>>> would really make any difference from the lab perspective.
>>
>> That said, I'm sure we could use zsync to improve download times in the
>> dispatcher.  I don't know much about it though -- do you have to
>> explicitly point zsync at the version of the file you've already
>> downloaded?  We _could_ probably keep the latest version of each "kind"
>> of image we downloaded (somehow... imagine me waving my hands furiously
>> at this point).
>
> Yeah, that's what I was thinking about actually. If we have resources,
> we could store and cache the pre-built images used at lava for at
> least a few days (3 or 4). That would already be enough at least for
> the daily images to be way faster.

OK.  I filed https://bugs.launchpad.net/lava-dispatcher/+bug/1017791 so
as not to forget about this completely.  No promises on when it can be
implemented by...

>> What would be utterly awesome of course would be some
>> kind of automagic thing for squid that used zsync without us knowing
>> about it :)
>
> Sure, but I don't yet know any solution that would be smart enough to
> do what we need/want :-)

Shame!

Cheers,
mwh

_______________________________________________
linaro-validation mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-validation

Reply via email to