Andy Doan <[email protected]> writes: > On 08/21/2012 07:48 AM, Dave Pigott wrote: >> On 21 Aug 2012, at 12:16, Alexander Sack wrote: >>> On this front: is there an easy way to check that a certain build >>> is suitable for health check? If so, we could make that part of >>> our monthly validation process and daily dashboard and assign >>> priority to bugs that would disqualify a build from being suitable >>> as a health check... >>> >>> What do you think? >> >> Hmm. Nice idea, and I was thinking along similar lines as we were >> going through this crisis. We need to think about this and how we >> might achieve it. > > I had my 1x1 with asac and have a thought on this. Lets take the monthly > releases and submit like 50 jobs for that image that work like a health > job. We can then look at the results and see how it compares to the > previous month's releases. This should help us know what's good and also > provide some valuable metrics to the other Platform teams in Linaro.
That said, I don't really see why we'd change which image our health check board uses unless we had a good reason. The point of them is to keep an eye on the state of the hardware... Cheers, mwh _______________________________________________ linaro-validation mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-validation
