We need a way to better investigate whats going on.

Are we using dhclient or how are we getting the IP?

Anyway, I feel to nail this down we need first make this reproducible.
For that having a "(re-)connect to eth on ubuntu" test case in our
enablement suite that we just run 10000 times for a test job without
rebooting and see if it breaks might do it...

Maybe someone from Ricardo's team or naresh/soumya (all three CCed)
can help write a simple lava-test that does that and integrate that in
our enablement testsuite for lava-test? Once we can force reproduction
we have a better chance to nail this down and we can ensure that
priority is there to fix this in kernel etc.

Note: not saying this has to happen now, but we need to improve how we
deal with rarely happen issues in a way that we nail them down.
Otherwise we will never reach 99.999% health job success :).


On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 5:18 PM, Andy Doan <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 09/19/2012 06:01 AM, Alexander Sack wrote:
>>
>> Do we know why we have regular networking issues on master images
>> still? Can we have an effort to nail this down? How can we do that?
>
>
> We attempted to add some debugging in the past, but so far nothing has
> helped much. The biggest problem we have now is repeatability of this issue.
> If you ignore the TC2 failures which are skewing the results a little now,
> we have about a 5% failure rate (for a 2 week period we actually had 1%!).
> Of that 5%, 50% are network related:
>
>  pinging control fails
>  downloading *.tgz in master fails
>
> So out of 100 runs we get about 2 "wget" type failues and 2 "ping" type
> failures. Regardless of how small the number is, its _half_ of our issues,
> so we do get a good bang for our buck by improving it.



-- 
Alexander Sack
Technical Director, Linaro Platform Teams
http://www.linaro.org | Open source software for ARM SoCs
http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg - http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog

_______________________________________________
linaro-validation mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-validation

Reply via email to