Dave Pigott <[email protected]> writes: > On 1 Oct 2012, at 09:48, Michael Hudson-Doyle wrote: > >> Dave Pigott <[email protected]> writes: >> >>> On 1 Oct 2012, at 03:06, Michael Hudson-Doyle wrote: >>> >>>> Michael Hudson-Doyle <[email protected]> writes: >>>> >>>>> Hi all, >>>>> >>>>> Just a quick note to say that I'm restoring the staging database from >>>>> the latest production snapshot. Staging will be down for however long >>>>> this takes (maybe an hour). >>>> >>>> Now done. We're a little tight for disk space on staging -- I had to >>>> delete the logs and bundles to get the restore to complete. Can that be >>>> upped without trashing the instance? >>> >>> Rats. Looks like you can't do this on a live instance. Let me know >>> when, >> >> Well, if you're working, I'm probably not :-) So whenever is fine as >> far as I'm concerned. > > OK. Shut down the old ones and created a new flavor, m1.lava, which > has 8GB RAM, 50GB HD, 4CPUs and 80GB ephemeral storage. Two new > instances, dogfood and staging, still at the same ip addresses.
Um. That wasn't what I was expecting! I thought you were going to shut the instance down, resize the root volume and bring the same instance up again. Is that not possible? Luckily lava-deployment-tool makes the set up pretty easy :-) Cheers, mwh > If someone walks me through it or point me at a wiki it would be quite > good to know how to deploy a lava server from scratch. > > Dave > >> >>> and I'll restart it with more space. Would 100GB be enough? >> >> Given 10 Gb is tight but workable, 100 Gb almost seems excessive :) But >> if we have the capacity, sure, sounds good. >> >> Cheers, >> mwh _______________________________________________ linaro-validation mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-validation
