On 12 Nov 2012, at 15:33, Andy Doan <[email protected]> wrote: > On 11/10/2012 03:17 AM, Dave Pigott wrote: >> Just the one… >> >> ------------ >> panda03 >> ------------ >> http://validation.linaro.org/lava-server/scheduler/job/38289 >> >> Looks like the board locked up just after the startup animation completed. >> Went onto the board, and it was indeed locked. Hardreset and it came back. >> Put it down to a one off glitch. > > Thanks for looking into this. With the new "newline" code the failure pattern > looked different and I wasn't sure what went wrong. > > I think we've had this type of failure occur 3 times in the past week on > Panda. I think its becoming our #2 failure reason (more days needed to really > be sure).
I suspect you're right, and underlining what Michael said the other day: We should define a period (week/month) over which we collect stats, and then the biggest problem in that period gets the attention, and then iterate until the failures are negligibly small and we move to the next highest sample unit (month/quarter -> quarter/year). The data set is now small enough it might warrant a month cycle, but I'm happy to review each week and see where we are. Thanks Dave _______________________________________________ linaro-validation mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-validation
