On 19 Nov 2012, at 17:03, Andy Doan <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hey Guys,
>
> We currently use ubuntu-desktop RFS's for our daily health checks in LAVA.
> Its my understanding the dev-platform team will be sunsetting ubuntu-desktop
> images.
>
> Due to this, I think we (the LAVA team) need to think about moving to a new
> set of images for our health checks so that they better reflect reality.
> 2012.11 should be producing some pre-built images for both server and nano. I
> think picking the server pre-built images probably makes more sense since it
> gives us a little more coverage than nano, but I don't have a strong sense on
> whether it makes much difference since we basically just do boot-testing in
> our health check.
>
> = So what does this mean?
>
> I think we'll need to file a 12.12 blueprint for doing health check
> investigation work. Essentially, we should build a job for each device-type
> in production based off its health job. We then update the image URL to be
> the new candidate. We then submit it 100 times and do a failure analysis. At
> this point we cross our fingers and hope the failures aren't worse than what
> we currently see. If so, we can switch the image over. If its not the case,
> we'll need to work with dev-platform team on getting new issues addressed.
>
> make sense?
> who wants to help? :)
I've probably got most experience in this, so put me down for it. :)
Dave
>
> -andy
>
> _______________________________________________
> linaro-validation mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-validation
_______________________________________________
linaro-validation mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-validation
