On 17 December 2012 02:22, Michael Hudson-Doyle <[email protected]> wrote: > Fathi Boudra <[email protected]> writes: > >> Hi, >> >> On 13 December 2012 11:48, Senthil Kumaran <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I converted lava-test test definitions to work on lava-test-shell with the >>> new YAML format. These converted tests are mostly from >>> https://code.launchpad.net/~linaro-foundations >>> >>> I request someone from developer platform team to merge these tests to the >>> bzr repositories so that it will be easy to maintain these tests in future. >> >> Commited. Thanks Senthil. > > I'm a little confused, for a few reasons: > > 0) Why were these merges not requested as merge proposals on Launchpad? > > 1) Fathi says "committed" but > e.g. lp:~linaro-foundations/linaro-ubuntu/lava-test-device-tree does > not seem to have had device-tree-patch.txt applied.
As documented on the blueprint and also in some mails sent to the mailing list, we're moving to git.linaro.org: http://git.linaro.org/gitweb?p=ubuntu/test-definitions.git > 2) The patches themselves are a little strange: device-tree-patch.txt, > when applied to > lp:~linaro-foundations/linaro-ubuntu/lava-test-device-tree means that > one can use a lava_test_shell action that has {'bzr-repo': > 'lp:~linaro-foundations/linaro-ubuntu/lava-test-device-tree'} but you > also need to set testdef to 'yaml/device-tree.yaml' rather than just > adding it as the default lavatest.yaml and *then* even if you did > this, the testdef would check > lp:~linaro-foundations/linaro-ubuntu/lava-test-device-tree out again > and run the tests from this second copy. > > Am I horribly misunderstanding something here? Even if I am, I still > think things should be redone like I outline above! _______________________________________________ linaro-validation mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-validation
