Hi Dave thanks for the clarification. Could you get in touch with [email protected] directly and describe what is the issue you are experiencing?
Thanks, Ilias -- Ilias Biris - [email protected] Technical Program Manager, Linaro M: +358504839608, IRC: ibiris, Skype: ilias_biris Linaro.org | Open source software for ARM SoCs On 5 June 2013 13:35, Dave Pigott <[email protected]> wrote: > No, we just swapped the hardware out. We have a diagram of the node/slot > layout as a guide. > > Dave > > On 5 Jun 2013, at 11:16, Ilias Biris <[email protected]> wrote: > > https://jira.calxeda.com/browse/LINARO-1 > > Back to Calxeda and ask their input. For the record, in the same ticket > Chris Oakley from Calxeda who's following this case had requested that we > arrange a chat with him to coordinate the swap out and walk through FW > upgrade after, did that chat take place? > > Best regards, > > -- > Ilias Biris - [email protected] > Technical Program Manager, Linaro > M: +358504839608, IRC: ibiris, Skype: ilias_biris > Linaro.org | Open source software for ARM SoCs > > > On 5 June 2013 13:10, Dave Pigott <[email protected]> wrote: > >> OK - so we've double checked and re-seated the boards and done some >> diagnostics. We've found the following: >> >> * On the new board, which contains nodes 8, 9, 10 and 11, only 9 and 10 >> consistently come up and get served an ip address based on their MAC >> address. Nodes 8 and 11 don't always show up when trying to probe MAC >> addresses. >> >> * Nodes 12, 13, 14 and 15 are showing up on a macaddr lookup >> consistently, but only sometimes being served an ip address. >> >> * If we probe nodes in the 12-15 range, it sometimes brings them to life. >> >> So, conclusions: >> >> * The new board has only 2 nodes that work consistently >> * The board with nodes 12->15 is not behaving. >> >> On a side note, we've noticed that several nodes don't consistently get >> served, but the ones detailed are the worst offenders. >> >> Not totally sure where to go from here. >> >> Dave >> >> On 5 Jun 2013, at 09:57, Dave Pigott <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Something very odd here, post the broken node replacement. Matt and I are >> investigating and need exclusive access today, because we need to power >> cycle it, probably more than once. >> >> Thanks >> >> Dave >> >> On 4 Jun 2013, at 21:45, Matthew Gretton-Dann < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> Node 16: 192.168.1.111 >> Node 17: 192.168.2.126 >> >> >> >> > >
_______________________________________________ linaro-validation mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-validation
