On 19 Jul 2013, at 15:12, Antonio Terceiro <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 11:44:53AM +0100, Dave Pigott wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> Well, as happens every time I play with the lava cloud nothing goes quite as >> smoothly as it should. Essentially, what's happened, is that I've suspended >> the staging instance, then I tried the migration, but that failed because of >> an OpenStack network issue. This I fixed, but it still won't migrate for >> reasons I don't fully understand. >> >> I then tried un-suspending the staging instance and it's not coming back up. >> <<sigh>> >> >> The *easy* path to follow would be to blow it all away and just make a new >> staging instance on bare metal, but I'm worried about losing the history on >> that machine, so I'm going to endeavour to unknot the issue and get staging >> back up again so that I can at least backup up the database so we maintain >> the history, then I'll move it to bare metal. >> >> Sorry for the delays, but I can't give a timeframe as yet as to when staging >> will be available again. >> >> I'd like to canvas people's opinions on how important the staging history >> is. It seems to me that it probably isn't that important, but other >> perspectives would be useful. > > Before we have a consistent procedure for using tests on staging as > prerequisite for updating production, my feeling is that the data on > staging is not so important. That will change once that procedure is in > place. I tend to agree. I've managed to rescue the qemu disk image from staging, and have it backed up so we can always look at it at a later time if needed. I'll do a tear down and new deploy of staging on bare metal on Monday. Thanks Dave _______________________________________________ linaro-validation mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-validation
