Hello,

On Tue, 16 Jul 2013 12:52:59 +0200
Zygmunt Bazyli Krynicki <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi
> 
> Mocker and mock are totally different. Mock is in stdlib since 3.3 so
> it is likely the future but I found mocker easier to use and
> understand (I'm also the current maintainer for mocker, if inactive a
> bit).
> 
> As for nose/py.test: both are a bit non standard. 

Please define "standard". Let's read
http://docs.python.org/2/library/unittest.html : "The Python unit
testing framework, sometimes referred to as “PyUnit,” is a Python
language version of JUnit". So, what we read is that Python somehow
includes Java's standard test facility, but what's standard for Java is
not natural for Python (or we could just stick with Java in the first
place). "Standard" is what follows language philosophy, and nosetests
is truly adheres to that - easy and intuitive start, learn extra and
more powerful features as you progress and need them.

> I would strongly
> recommend that you use unittest2, the python 2.x backport of updated
> stdlib test stuff. It has a lot of compatible extensions. 

Looking at https://pypi.python.org/pypi/unittest2 : "The new features
in unittest for Python 2.7 backported to Python 2.3+." So, it appears
it's confusion: there's no unittest2 really (well, maybe there's in
Python2.4 world, but where's that?), it's just unittest of Python2.7.

> Python.test
> and nose have those too but 1) they are not compatible 2) IMHO there
> is no advantage over stock stuff _anymore_

Looking at
http://www.voidspace.org.uk/python/articles/unittest2.shtml , it starts
with advertizing alphabet soup like:

assertIDontKnownHowItsWrittenLessOrEqualOrEqualOrLess()

So, how there's "no advantage over stock stuff _anymore_", can I just
create a dir "tests", put "test_it.py" file there, write in it:

===
def test():
    assert foo <= 5
===

Run single command w/o params and get tests run?



-- 
Best Regards,
Paul

Linaro.org | Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro
http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg - http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog

_______________________________________________
linaro-validation mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-validation

Reply via email to