OK - for the moment, I've off-lined 04. Longer term we need a better solution.
I think that the problem is that adb is buggy. It is clearly *supposed* to work with multiple devices simultaneously, otherwise why have it running as a daemon? Course of action: * We can patch around it by having an "android" device tag, which will be guaranteed to only have one instance per LAVA worker node. * We should also investigate if there is an adb update that fixes the simultaneous connection issue. Thanks Dave On 25 Nov 2013, at 09:47, Vishal Bhoj <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > The models are currently stable. Here are the jobs for release. Most of it > has completed: > http://validation.linaro.org/scheduler/job/87699 > https://validation.linaro.org/scheduler/job/87700 > https://validation.linaro.org/scheduler/job/87701 > > Submitted one more with partial test from job 87700: > http://validation.linaro.org/scheduler/job/88187 > > Its okay to have multiple models per machine but we need to have only one > model running Android per machine which has proven to be stable. If we run > Android on more than one model per machine then it results in adb errors. > Hence Yongqin requested to take _04 offline. > > Currently juice is the only project where Android is booted extensively on > "rtsm_fvp_base-aemv8a" models. It is preferred to have only one such model > per H/W instance to have the setup stable for Android. > > Regards, > Vishal > > > On 25 November 2013 15:01, Jakub Pavelek <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi guys, > > we should have setup with one model per HW instance. (Otherwise our tests > will not run reliably). Guys help us getting that up and running again, it is > release week. > > Br, > > --jakub > > > On 24 November 2013 14:52, Antonio Terceiro <[email protected]> > wrote: > On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 12:54:40AM +0800, Yongqin Liu wrote: > > Hi, Antonio > > > > Thanks for the help. > > http://validation.linaro.org/scheduler/job/87680/log_file is booted up with > > the latest build#219. > > > > But one thing I noticed that, both rtsm_fvp_base-aemv8a_02 and > > rtsm_fvp_base-aemv8a_04 are on fastmodels02.localdomain, > > could you help to disable rtsm_fvp_base-aemv8a_04? > > since when run two instances on one node at the same time, it may cause the > > adb problem. > > There are fastmodels on the same machine (which may also cause the same > problem?) so I doubt if take _04 offline will make any difference. > -- > Antonio Terceiro > Software Engineer - Linaro > http://www.linaro.org > > > _______________________________________________ > linaro-validation mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-validation
_______________________________________________ linaro-validation mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-validation
