Hi,

We were trying to get the latest puslished (5.3) foundation models in LAVA.

Using the reference as 
http://git.linaro.org/lava/lava-dispatcher.git/blob/HEAD:/lava_dispatcher/default-config/lava-dispatcher/device-types/rtsm_foundation-armv8.conf

# The new (2013-10-03) Foundation model install places the simulator binary at 
Foundation_v8pkg/models/Linux64_GCC-4.1/Foundation_v8
21<http://git.linaro.org/lava/lava-dispatcher.git/blob/HEAD:/lava_dispatcher/default-config/lava-dispatcher/device-types/rtsm_foundation-armv8.conf#l21>
 # A symbolic link has been created in our arm_models-2013-10-03.tgz package to 
workaround this change for compatibilty sake. If you are getting an error
22<http://git.linaro.org/lava/lava-dispatcher.git/blob/HEAD:/lava_dispatcher/default-config/lava-dispatcher/device-types/rtsm_foundation-armv8.conf#l22>
 # chances are you are running a newer Foundation model and need to adjust this 
path.
23<http://git.linaro.org/lava/lava-dispatcher.git/blob/HEAD:/lava_dispatcher/default-config/lava-dispatcher/device-types/rtsm_foundation-armv8.conf#l23>
 simulator_command = sudo -u www-data /opt/arm/Foundation_v8pkg/Foundation_v8 
--image={AXF} --block-device={IMG} --network=nat

Not quite sure what the comment refers to. However the key point for me is that 
rather than using the axf file I was hoping to define the boot options similar 
to what we have for the Base models.

The following is the typical boot options I wanted to use

<path-to>/Foundation_v8                   \
--cores=4                                 \
--no-secure-memory                        \
--visualization                           \
--gicv3                                   \
--data="<path to bl1.bin>"@0x0            \
--data="<path to UEFI binary>"@0x8000000  \
--block-device="<path-to>/vexpress64-openembedded_lamp-armv8_20130927-7.img"

This would let me override the various argument like number of cores / --gicv3 
or -no-gicv3 flag.

My understanding is that foundation models are quite cutdown version of Base 
models and hence does   not have semihosting capabilitie etc, hence the uefi 
and blockdevice path should be relative to that of the foundation model 
location.

Question:: Can we use the boot options for foundation model the similar way it 
is used for base models?  Is there an example for the same where we could 
cross-reference?

Thanks
Basil Eljuse...

-- IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are 
confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, 
please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to any 
other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the information in any 
medium. Thank you.

ARM Limited, Registered office 110 Fulbourn Road, Cambridge CB1 9NJ, Registered 
in England & Wales, Company No: 2557590
ARM Holdings plc, Registered office 110 Fulbourn Road, Cambridge CB1 9NJ, 
Registered in England & Wales, Company No: 2548782
_______________________________________________
linaro-validation mailing list
linaro-validation@lists.linaro.org
http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-validation

Reply via email to