With all due respect:

 

1.      If it is true, as has been asserted, that building your new home to be 
all-electric “will not make the more expensive to build or operate”, then we 
would not need a law to force people to do so.  One cannot have it both ways!  
If X is actually better for folks, then one would not need a law to force folks 
to do X!  Even a casual reader of history will read about those in government 
who cry, “the foolish people are just ignorant, and don’t see what’s good for 
them; we are just doing this on their behalf, forcing them to undertake what 
will be more beneficial for them!  Don’t you get it?  We know better than you 
do!”  

Similarly, let us not forget that it’s not just about the money.  Choosing X 
instead of Y can be driven not just be money, but by other benefits.  Some 
folks might prefer certain attributes of Y, even if Y might cost less.  As one 
example – if you live in a 3,000 sq foot house, you would almost certainly save 
money if you lived in a 2,000 sq ft house – so why would you want to live in 
the bigger house?  You might save money by driving a Prius or a Tesla, so why 
shouldn’t we force people to only buy those vehicles?

Is it so hard to see that individuals can make the best decisions for 
themselves, to decide what’s in their best interests?

 

 

2.      “Climate justice is racial justice?”   Again, with all due respect, 
this is just . . . man, I lack the words.  So we are clear – thanks to the 
growth of free-market (ish) economics in developing nations over the last three 
decades, primarily in China and India but also other developing countries, OVER 
A BILLION PEOPLE HAVE CLIMBED OUT OF EXTREME POVERTY.  It’s an amazing feat!  
And one of the biggest drivers of that climb out of poverty – THE AVAILABILITY 
OF AFFORDABLE ENERGY, POWERED BY FOSSIL FUELS.  

Yes, read that again.  Improved agriculture, the growth of manufacturing, 
expanding free trade, migration from rural to urban areas have helped billions 
of people climb out of horrible, subsistence-level (or below!!!) living.  The 
middle-class is explosively growing.  What drives all of that?  Affordable, 
available energy.  Countless families have transitioned out of subsistence 
farming, with heating and cooking using wood or dung and resulting in terrible 
casualties from lung illnesses, thanks to the availability of gas-powered 
machinery and available electric grids.

The sheer . . . well, I won’t label it, but I will say that it astonishes me 
what folks living in the 1% in affluent American suburbs (and make no mistakes, 
if you’re a working adult in Lincoln, you’re almost certainly in the global 1%; 
you just need $34k in annual income) will make arguments on  behalf of the 
”oppressed”, and make claims of “racial justice”, WHILE TRYING TO ELIMINATE 
THAT WHICH HELPED PROPEL MORE THAN A BILLION PEOPLE OUT OF POVERTY:  affordable 
energy powered by, yes, fossil fuels.  

The primary reason why making these little symbolic, virtue-signaling gestures 
in rich American suburbs will have zero measurable impact on climate gas 
emissions is because America got rich by burning lots of coal and oil; now 
China and India are doing the same thing, lifting billions of poverty, thanks 
to burning lots of coal and oil.  Who the heck are we to tell China and India, 
“hey, you guys missed the boat, you need to stop producing that critically 
needed energy, and immiserate your people!”

Want *real* justice for the poor and oppressed around the globe?  Stand by and 
let them climb out of poverty in the same way America did, starting a century 
ago, and focus instead on transitioning *mass* energy production to natural gas 
and nuclear, keep working on renewable energy, and *let human ingenuity 
research ways of mitigating the effects of climate change and even turning it 
back through terraforming measures.*

https://ourworldindata.org/extreme-poverty 

https://www.nytimes.com/2021/12/02/world/global-poverty-united-nations.html#:~:text=By%202015%2C%20the%20share%20of,extreme%20poverty%2C%20surpassing%20the%20goal.

 

I’m just . . . at a loss for more words.

 

--Dennis

 

 

From: Lincoln <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Paul Shorb
Sent: Sunday, March 27, 2022 2:50 PM
To: <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [LincolnTalk] Town meeting Article 40/31

 

I would like to respond to some recent posts here that seem to critique a move 
towards fossil-fuel-free homes as an expensive luxury for high-minded 
hypocrites who blissfully ignore adverse cost impacts on those economically 
less well-off. Here are some relevant facts that may be of interest to LT 
readers.

 

Requiring new homes to be all-electric will not make them more expensive to 
build or operate. In fact, due to the almost miraculous energy efficiency of 
modern heat pumps, they tend to be LESS expensive to operate, thereby 
benefiting not only high-end homeowners but also less-affluent renters. (Not to 
mention the health benefits of cleaner indoor air.)  A recent state study show 
the cost benefits are even better for multi-family housing than for single 
family homes.

 

All-electric homes are not required to have an emergency generator. Whether 
someone wants to have an emergency generator is a personal choice; many homes 
powered by fossil fuels choose to have one. We mention emergency generators to 
underscore that we expect they would still be allowed as an option, when and if 
Lincoln adopts a bylaw. Even if you assume a generator to be an additional cost 
associated with an all-electric house, that likely will be offset by reduced 
operating costs.

 

With regard to DIE, it's hard to come up with something with more disparate 
impact on people of color than our current fossil-fuel economy and the climate 
change it is causing. 

In America it typically is lower-income people - often people of color - who 
live closest to fossil fuel extraction areas, fuel refineries, power plants, 
and areas thickest with vehicle exhaust fumes, and who thereby suffer the most 
from the local pollution effects. 

Around the world, it is regions populated mainly by black and brown people that 
are getting hit the hardest by the many impacts of climate change. Those are 
the people who are most at risk of being pushed back into poverty and worse by 
extreme weather events, droughts, food shortages, and desperate migration 
attempts and ensuing political strife - even though they have done much less 
than the more developed, majority-white nations have done to cause the current 
climate crisis. 

That's why it is rightly said that "climate justice is racial justice".

 

- Paul Shorb

 

On Sat, Mar 26, 2022 at 1:16 PM Stephanie Smoot <[email protected] 
<mailto:[email protected]> > wrote:

I found irony that they were adding all these programs but a waiting list for 
senior tax work off spaces!

 

On Sat, Mar 26, 2022 at 1:09 PM Richard Panetta <[email protected] 
<mailto:[email protected]> > wrote:

So did anyone else find any irony in a report given about inclusion diversity 
equity and anti racism then the very next article the presenting sponsor when 
questioned about losing electricity stated well you can JUST get a propane 
generator for those needs.  Never mind a good generator can cost $5000 plus 
along with the yearly costs of the tank and propane. Just in case your non 
fossil fuel home loses power.

 

 

 

 

 

-- 
The LincolnTalk mailing list.
To post, send mail to [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> .
Search the archives at http://lincoln.2330058.n4.nabble.com/.
Browse the archives at https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/.
Change your subscription settings at 
https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.

-- 

Regards,  

Stephanie Smoot

 

857 368-9175  work

781 941-6842  personal cell

617 595-5217 work cell 

126 Chestnut Circle

Lincoln, MA 01773

 

 

-- 
The LincolnTalk mailing list.
To post, send mail to [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> .
Search the archives at http://lincoln.2330058.n4.nabble.com/.
Browse the archives at https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/.
Change your subscription settings at 
https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.

-- 
The LincolnTalk mailing list.
To post, send mail to [email protected].
Search the archives at http://lincoln.2330058.n4.nabble.com/.
Browse the archives at https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/.
Change your subscription settings at 
https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.

Reply via email to