WOW-Are you saying we relying on “over-use” to fund the Water Dept?
So, the rest must cut back even further to allow this use and to provide 
revenues?
Perhaps I have misunderstood.
I hope so.



------
Sara Mattes




> On Aug 4, 2022, at 8:29 PM, Ruth Ann Hendrickson <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
> 
> Yes, of course some people don't water their lawns and others have little or 
> no lawn and then some have vast lawns and water them lavishly. We have not 
> recently run the data to see the percentages. Let's just say that if all the 
> lavish waterers stopped irrigating, we wouldn't have enough revenue to run 
> the water department. The base charge only covers part of the cost 
> maintaining and operating the water infrastructure.
> 
> For leak detection, professionals drive through the town in the early morning 
> hours when very little water is consumed, and they use special 
> highly-sensitive acoustic equipment to hear the sound of running water. The 
> water department also attempts to measure or calculate other non-metered 
> water use, such as main flushing, firefighting, etc. They measure the water 
> pumped out into the system, subtract the water read by the meters, and the 
> water used in known activities mentioned above and the result is the 
> unaccounted for water (UAW). They always find a number of leaks, some quite 
> substantial, and fix them quickly. A UAW of 25% is not uncommon.
> 
> Ruth Ann Hendrickson
> (She, her)
> On 8/4/2022 10:46 AM, Andy Wang wrote:
>> I'm curious, is it that some folks are going WAY over 65 gal/per person/per 
>> day and throwing off the average or is that most households are going over 
>> that per day?  Just curious if it is largely a systemic issue or just a few 
>> outliers that are pulling the numbers high. That seems like the water 
>> department or the town has that data since they are billing people.  Is that 
>> information public record?  Seems like an interesting dataset to go through.
>> 
>> Also, 25% water loss seems huge.  What is the mechanism to detect loss of 
>> water?  I presume you know how much is being cumulatively pushed through all 
>> the meters in Lincoln (the out), but are there multiple points to measure 
>> the input flow?  Or even localize?  I know when the town suspected a leak 
>> near our house, they hired someone with acoustic equipment to find the leak. 
>>  it worked, but probably not cost effective on a large scale.
>> 
>> Andy
>> 
>> On Thu, Aug 4, 2022 at 10:23 AM RAandBOB <[email protected] 
>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>> The state restricts us in three ways: we are supposed to meet 65 gallons per 
>> person per day overall. We have a maximum amount of water we may draw from 
>> the well and from the pond. Our unaccounted for water should be less than 
>> 10%. We don’t meet any of those metrics. 
>> 
>> We are not over by a lot in water usage, but we are always over. We are 
>> under during the winter months, and significantly over during the summer 
>> months, so you know that the extra water usage is from outdoor watering. 
>> 
>> With regard to the leaks, we have a leak detection program that was yearly 
>> and is now going to be multiple times per year, but we still have almost 25% 
>> water loss. My personal suspicion is that it is from leaking service lines 
>> between the street and the house. Very hard to detect especially for houses 
>> that are far from the street.
>> 
>> Be a good scout for the water department. If you hear running water or see 
>> swampy areas in your yard or in the woods, call us. The last two major leaks 
>> that we fixed were reported by alert citizens.
>> 
>> Ruth Ann
>> (She, her, hers)
>> 
>>> On Aug 3, 2022, at 3:06 PM, Ursula Nowak <[email protected] 
>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> 
>>> If you are referring to my email, I didn't say we are using more than our 
>>> neighboring towns. We are using more than the goal set by the state for us 
>>> which is 65 gallons per person per day. At least that is my understanding 
>>> of why we are a level above the state drought restrictions but perhaps a 
>>> member of the water commission could shed more light on this. I attended 
>>> part of their meeting on Friday and was impressed with their dedication and 
>>> diligence. I am grateful for the work they do on our behalf! 
>>> Ursula
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Wed, Aug 3, 2022 at 2:45 PM Pat Gray <[email protected] 
>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>> First, is the data correct?
>>> 
>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>> 
>>> > On Aug 3, 2022, at 2:42 PM, Elaine Hawkes <[email protected] 
>>> > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>> > 
>>> > Having read that our town uses more water than others, and not noticing 
>>> > that we, or our cars,  are any cleaner than average, I am wondering in 
>>> > what ways we are using so much water.
>>> > Does the data give any information?
>>> > Thanks,
>>> > Elaine 
>>> > 🤔
>>> > -- 
>>> > The LincolnTalk mailing list.
>>> > To post, send mail to [email protected] 
>>> > <mailto:[email protected]>.
>>> > Search the archives at http://lincoln.2330058.n4.nabble.com/ 
>>> > <http://lincoln.2330058.n4.nabble.com/>.
>>> > Browse the archives at 
>>> > https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/ 
>>> > <https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/>.
>>> > Change your subscription settings at 
>>> > https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln 
>>> > <https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln>.
>>> > 
>>> -- 
>>> The LincolnTalk mailing list.
>>> To post, send mail to [email protected] 
>>> <mailto:[email protected]>.
>>> Search the archives at http://lincoln.2330058.n4.nabble.com/ 
>>> <http://lincoln.2330058.n4.nabble.com/>.
>>> Browse the archives at https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/ 
>>> <https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/>.
>>> Change your subscription settings at 
>>> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln 
>>> <https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln>.
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> The LincolnTalk mailing list.
>>> To post, send mail to [email protected] 
>>> <mailto:[email protected]>.
>>> Search the archives at http://lincoln.2330058.n4.nabble.com/ 
>>> <http://lincoln.2330058.n4.nabble.com/>.
>>> Browse the archives at https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/ 
>>> <https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/>.
>>> Change your subscription settings at 
>>> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln 
>>> <https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln>.
>>> 
>> -- 
>> The LincolnTalk mailing list.
>> To post, send mail to [email protected] 
>> <mailto:[email protected]>.
>> Search the archives at http://lincoln.2330058.n4.nabble.com/ 
>> <http://lincoln.2330058.n4.nabble.com/>.
>> Browse the archives at https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/ 
>> <https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/>.
>> Change your subscription settings at 
>> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln 
>> <https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln>.
>> 
> -- 
> The LincolnTalk mailing list.
> To post, send mail to [email protected].
> Search the archives at http://lincoln.2330058.n4.nabble.com/.
> Browse the archives at https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/.
> Change your subscription settings at 
> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.
> 

-- 
The LincolnTalk mailing list.
To post, send mail to [email protected].
Search the archives at http://lincoln.2330058.n4.nabble.com/.
Browse the archives at https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/.
Change your subscription settings at 
https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.

Reply via email to