While the focus here is on smaller, piston planes, the saga is instructive.
While we may all dream of fossil-free fuel, history suggests it will be decades 
before it is a reality.
And, in the meantime, 27 hangers will be housing privately owned 737s,757s, and 
767s who will be taking to the skies…over all our heads.




Feb 22, 2023    View in browser 
<https://go.politicoemail.com/?qs=82654279d91c9c656fdf7edce37d192bee8a6e8e019713a1bcc9e1f401e433440ff1b6784fa877aeaf92b7de2eb81b23>
 

BY ARIANNA SKIBELL <mailto:[email protected]>

Small airplanes and choppers flying overhead Veronica Licon’s house in San 
Jose, Calif., run on leaded gasoline. | Photos by Max Whittaker for POLITICO

The United States banned leaded gasoline for cars long ago, but smaller 
aircraft continue to use the fuel — and it’s exposing hundreds of thousands of 
children to lead poisoning.

POLITICO’s E&E News reporter Ariel Wittenberg dug into the issue in an 
investigation 
<https://go.politicoemail.com/?qs=82654279d91c9c65796145465bd949ae5c4b4f3ace6d2b3d608d1c589c8fe55c44fbcfa6c5201e0963ebdf27cb6c0c07>
 this week. She found that fuel producers such as Chevron and Exxon Mobil have 
repeatedly blocked efforts to create unleaded fuels for small aircraft.

That has led to massive health consequences for children who live below the 
flight path of these small airplanes. Toddlers in California's East San Jose 
have concentrations of lead in their blood on par with children tested at the 
height of the drinking water crisis in Flint, Mich.

In an interview with Power Switch this morning, Ariel breaks down the public 
health crisis and why, after 30 years, it has not been addressed.

What surprised you the most in reporting this story?

Everyone from the [Federal Aviation Administration] to the oil industry to the 
aviation industry has spent the past 30 years pursuing a silver-bullet solution 
to this problem. What surprised me most is that search has, essentially, been a 
mirage. Yes, there are many planes that need 100 octane. But 70 percent of the 
general aviation fleet could fly on a lower-octane fuel. But the aviation and 
fuel industry has blocked multiple alternative fuels over the past 30 years.

What are the advantages and pitfalls of having producers like Chevron and Exxon 
sit on the committee that could have approved a less heavily leaded fuel?

The people who make aviation fuel know how to make aviation fuel. It’s a niche 
market, so the producers are also the best subject-matter experts. The problem, 
however, is that the [committee] that approves these fuels runs on consensus. 
The same producers that have a vested financial interest in keeping lead in 
aviation fuel also have immense power to block any unleaded competition from 
coming to market.

What is the extent of the health-related damage? 

There are 5.2 million people that live within 500 meters of an airport runway, 
and 363,000 of them are children under five. Research has shown that living 
that close to a general aviation airport can increase levels of lead in kids’ 
blood. Lead is a neurotoxin that impairs cognitive development and is linked to 
lower IQ, so any exposure to it can be incredibly damaging.

Communities are demanding the government take action. When can we realistically 
expect the problem to be resolved?

It's hard to say when this will all be resolved. If EPA does move to totally 
ban lead in aviation fuel, it could be years before such a measure would take 
effect. The FAA has an initiative in coordination with the aviation and fuel 
industries to find a high-octane unleaded fuel, with the goal of one being 
widely available by 2030. But similar initiatives have existed over the past 
decade, and all of them have blown through their deadlines.

This interview has been edited for length and clarity. 

------
Sara Mattes




-- 
The LincolnTalk mailing list.
To post, send mail to [email protected].
Browse the archives at https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/.
Change your subscription settings at 
https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.

Reply via email to