All the emails filling my inbox are very much appreciated. 
Perhaps Town Meeting can be short. 
Michael Dembowski
Conant Road 

On May 10, 2023, at 6:43 PM, Sara Mattes <[email protected]> wrote:

I have been using COA programming for years…15 or so.
I have enjoyed multiple programs in multiple settings.
How was it possible then, but not now?

Perhaps there needs to be better space for social and health services, and even administration, but we need to continue with the use of programming in multiple locations-spaces and locations used in the past, locations that would be of good use for the future.

We need to be flexible and creative.

Sara




------
Sara Mattes




On May 10, 2023, at 5:35 PM, Barbara Low <[email protected]> wrote:

With regard to the COA&HS using various locations for their programming, the staff of the COA&HS cannot easily run programming in multiple locations and still do the other work they need to do. Programming is a large part of what the COA&HS does but there is also the social work/counseling/problem solving aspects of their jobs. Their jobs cannot be well done if they are running from site to site to manage programming. And Bemis is inadequate for the needs of the senior citizens -- access to the building, bathroom facilities (the handicapped bathrooms are in the basement and the large group programming is on the second floor), and private office space is lacking to have the necessary confidential meetings.

I think many of the people complaining about the community center are not folks who are currently using the COA&HS services. Your day will come.

Barbara

From: Lincoln <[email protected]> on behalf of Seth Rosen <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2023 4:54 PM
To: Ruth Ann Hendrickson <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [LincolnTalk] Community Center - more in-depth analysis and observations. Is it time for a course correction?
 

Ruth Ann - I can’t speak for others, but I am not disagreeing with the location of the proposed community center.  I agree if one was to be built, the Hartwell location is the optimal one.

I am disagreeing that we need a community center at all.  I don’t think we should build one.  Instead I think we should replace the current “pods” with new ones to accommodate LEAP and PRD. Keep the existing locations and modestly expand the footprints. Upgrade the other existing facilities to the extent needed to accommodate our current programming. 

That solution is perhaps $5-8m and accomplished all of the mission critical objectives.

Candidly, looking at the actual list of programs there are only nine (9) things on there that can’t continue to stay where they are.  And those nine things don’t even close to justify the construction of a new building, in my opinion. I’d encourage other taxpayers to look at the list and see if they think it justifies a solution of the scope and scale proposed. 

I think the reality is, because of our small size, our town requires the “decentralized” approach we’ve used to date.  

Seth 

On May 10, 2023, at 4:09 PM, Ruth Ann Hendrickson <[email protected]> wrote:


Five years or so ago, the assigned committees did an EXHAUSTIVE search for potential sites for a new Community Center including multiple open charettes to discuss locations. The overwhelming choice of the large group of participants was to have the Center at Hartwell. The motion at town meeting was worded to develop options for a Center near Hartwell. That is the CCBC's charge. They are not charged with considering new locations.
If a large group of people want to propose a different location, please form yourselves into an ad hoc committee and do the work to flesh out your ideas. You can get a head start by looking at the previous studies that considered other locations. Then ask the Selects if you can present your findings at the fall State of the Town Meeting. It is easy to say there are spaces at the Mall. It is much harder to be specific  - which spaces and what needs could be accommodated there.
I look forward the hearing  your proposals. New ideas are always worth consideration.
Ruth Ann Hendrickson
(She, her)
On 5/10/2023 3:43 PM, Peter Buchthal wrote:
We have started a robust discussion on LincolnTalk about the new community center.  It appears that after spending a short amount of time looking at the other available properties in the town, the committee has decided to only focus resources going forward on building a new facility on the Hartwell campus. 

 

Underused town resources require maintenance
We are a small town with many underused town resources.  Some of our town buildings are in need of overdue maintenance.  Shouldn’t all town buildings be ADA and handicap accessible?
Bemis needs a refresh and it will require ongoing maintenance even if we build a community center.  Shouldn’t we figure out how much this future underused building will cost the town to keep it in good shape?  Or are people suggesting the plan is to take it down at some point?  
The Pierce House has so much deferred maintenance that it may become unsafe in the near future.  The interior  reminds me of Miss Havisham’s home from Great Expectations.  Without a Pip or Estella to maintain it, we have allowed this generous gift from the Pierce family to fall into major disrepair.   As a key town property, we need to properly maintain the Pierce House and the grounds.   Why not create a better use of the building than a Wedding Factory?  
The world also appears to be going more and more digital.  Could some of the space of the town library be re-purposed for other town needs?
At a minimum, the town needs to properly plan for Bemis and Pierce House maintenance (ADA compliance).  As a homeowner, I know nothing gets maintained or fixed by itself.  Would these spaces meet some, many or most of the needs of COA with some investment?
 
Time to take a LEAP?
The current LEAP facilities are  in dire need of an upgrade. Our brand new school is way too large for our needs; we should investigate options for adding new community usage within it.  For most Lincoln residents who are not familiar with the layout,  Lincoln School Interior Final Plan is the final interior plan from the school building committee website.  The school’s 165K square feet should be able to host 1,000 students (based upon Mass State Building Standards)It is very important to note that the school was designed for 650+ students and currently has only 550 (PK-8).  Enrollment has consistently been going down and we don’t expect a reversal in trend where we would all of sudden have a need for an additional 100 students. We have significantly more classrooms than number of sections.  I propose we take a careful look at how our school’s 165K sqft are being used and repurpose some of it to be part of a new LEAP.  Leap is 100% after school and could take advantage of all of the bathroom, playgrounds, hvac and other facilities in the school at minimal cost.  Some will argue that we cannot use school facilities because projects/materials, etc will be disturbed but there are empty/underutilized spaces given the school was built for a much higher enrollment.  If Leap needs even more space, then let’s add space to the school as I believe having after Leap in the school just makes more sense.  Adding new space would be materially cheaper than hosting it in a new community center or updating Hartwell B.  Reconfiguring some of the existing classroom/hub layout would even be cheaper than any other building option for Leap.
Does a stage belong in the new community center?
Many of you all don’t know this, but the old Smith Gym used to have a stage at the end of the gym.   In the new school, the old stage was redesigned as the K-4 Music Room.  From the CCBC presentations, one of the users of a new stage at the Community Center would be the Smith School Musical productions.  I think it would be much less costly to find a new home for the current Music Room and recreate the Smith Stage in the Smith Gym where it belongs.  That will make it more convenient for kids both during school and after school to participate in theatre productions.

 

“Nice to haves” vs “Must haves”
It appears to me that both COA and Parks and Recs are struggling to justify their space needs.  We see programs that are earmarked to be relocated to the new Community Center without historical details of how many people participated in the offering on average (and maximum) in the past year or two.   Maybe we can use the “fix-it”/arts and crafts room for more than just arts and crafts and use it more hours of the day.
For instance, does Parks and Rec really need a conference room to host the summer camp staff?  I am of the understanding that the summer camp uses the school for bathrooms and inclement weather.  Surely, can’t we all agree that having a staff office in the current school during the summer time makes more sense than in the community center?
Another interesting point, vaccine clinics are labeled as “cannot stay” at the First Parish Church and therefore must be relocated to the new community center. I have been to vaccine clinics at the school gym and they have worked flawlessly. I am not sure if First Parish vaccine clinics are different than the ones held at the school, but could they not all continue to be held at the school? Are we suggesting, by labeling these as “cannot stay” that unless we build a community center, we will have to stop vaccine clinics? Does this apply to all the other activities in the “cannot stay” section?

 

Other thoughts
Wayland, a much larger town than ours is building a new senior center that is much smaller than the proposed plans.  Wayland expects to host 200 people at a time in their community center for both COA and Parks and Rec programs in this much smaller building – do we really expect the need for more space in Lincoln? There is a disconnect somewhere that needs to be explained. Let’s not make the same mistake we did with our disproportionately big school and build a 23K+ sqft community center without really understanding what usage it will get.
Having a community center on the Hartwell campus would mean a large increase in traffic. Do we really want all these additional drivers navigating around pre-school Magic Garden children running into the road/parking lot? I assume our school liability insurance would go up as a result.  Has anyone investigated this?
I want to be clear, I think we need to invest in the COA.  Let’s see if we can make it wonderful while being responsible with our resources and meeting our long standing commitment to our beautiful buildings.

Peter Buchthal
71 Weston Rd.

-- 
The LincolnTalk mailing list.
To post, send mail to [email protected].
Browse the archives at https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/.
Change your subscription settings at https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.

-- 
The LincolnTalk mailing list.
To post, send mail to [email protected].
Browse the archives at https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/.
Change your subscription settings at https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.

--
The LincolnTalk mailing list.
To post, send mail to [email protected].
Browse the archives at https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/.
Change your subscription settings at https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.

-- 
The LincolnTalk mailing list.
To post, send mail to [email protected].
Browse the archives at https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/.
Change your subscription settings at 
https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.

Reply via email to