Dear Lincoln,
*What will our choice for Lincoln's future be at Town meeting?* It may
depend on our collective voices October 10th. My thoughts for HCAWG and a
more thorough explanation from a fellow citizen are below:


Dear Housing Choice Act Working Group,

1) I agree with the viewpoint Bob Domnitz voiced on LIncoln Talk and below.

In addition:
2) Lincoln has long supported a variety of housing options and we have a
lot of housing already - it is important that everyone on the working group
visits all the sections of town mentioned to see all the existing housing
we have.

3) The MBTA is not currently a popular choice of transportation nor the
only choice of transportation for those units - it is highly likely that
400-500 additional units of housing at Lincoln Station will bring two cars
per unit - that is another 800-1000 cars of daily traffic for the town.

4) Lincoln is Lincoln - putting a proposal forward for dense housing in one
location is not in keeping with and would be a stresser on Lincoln's
important history of being a town where people can live in and with nature.

If this is a choice - why would we put the strain on the people currently
living near Lincoln Station, people visiting and driving through Lincoln
Station, and the schools and other services. If you go forward with a plan
to propose 1000 additional cars at Lincoln Station and 500 additional
housing units in one location, is it not the end of the Lincoln we know?

Sincerely,
Barbara Peskin
299 South Great Rd


*From:* Robert Domnitz <[email protected]>
*Sent:* Friday, October 6, 2023 1:30 PM
*To:* [email protected]
*Subject:* [LincolnTalk] Thoughts on the Housing Choice Act and the October
10th Multi-Board Meeting

As a recently-retired member of the Planning Board and Housing Choice Act
Working Group, I am concerned that the three options presented last
Saturday at the SOTT - and the plan to choose just one of those options at
a multi-board meeting on October 10th - will restrict Town Meeting to
merely rubber-stamping the HCAWG's decision. And the HCAWG's decision will
reflect its embedded priorities that may differ from what town meeting
would choose if we are given more options. I therefore think it is crucial
for the HCAWG to submit several options to the state for advisory opinions
prior to Town Meeting. All options should be presented to Town Meeting for
debate and vote.


I'd like to expand on some of the points made - and some of the points
omitted - by the presenters at last Saturday's SOTT meeting.


1. *About 35% of the town's residences are currently multi-family* (not
including Hanscom Field, see list below). Most folks are surprised when
they hear this. Lincoln has done an outstanding job allowing multi-family
living while maintaining our rural character. With full build-out under the
HCA, multi-family housing will approach 50% of the town's inventory.


2. *State guidelines for the HCA provide a mechanism for towns to get
credit for existing multifamily housing.* Towns are free to locate
HCA-compliant subdistricts in areas that currently have high residential
density. These subdistricts will help us meet our "quota," even though it
is very unlikely these areas will be redeveloped.


3. *An evaluation of the various options requires consideration of the
likelihood that redevelopment will actually occur.* Existing condo
developments would require consent of the owners to redevelop, with the
particular procedures laid out in the condominiums' organizational
documents. If condo owners don't want redevelopment to happen, it won't
happen. Existing apartment buildings (e.g., Oriole Landing) owned by a
single entity would only require a decision by that entity and would depend
on their analysis of whether an increase in density would justify the cost
of redevelopment. On the other hand, rezoning single family homes on Codman
Road as shown in options A,B, and C from the HCAWG would likely result in
rapid redevelopment, as owners on Codman Road take advantage of the jump in
value that would result from the increase in development potential.


4. *State guidelines require that only 20% of the HCA-compliant district be
located in the vicinity of the commuter rail station*. The other 80% can be
anywhere in town. However, the HCAWG eliminated consideration of the Farrar
Pond and Lincoln Ridge condos as "too far from any amenities and public
transit." See link below to p. 17 of SOTT slide deck. This area could be
used as part of our plan for compliance; the HCAWG's decision to eliminate
consideration of this area reflects their prioritization of access to
public transit and goes beyond what the state requires. Similarly, the
Commons/Oriole Landing area was removed from consideration by the HCAWG
because it is "not walkable to any public transit or public amenities." See
p. 20 of SOTT slide deck. Instead, the HCAWG has proposed placing 100% of
the district in Lincoln Station (option C) or adding to option C additional
subdistricts in North Lincoln so that the total development potential
greatly exceeds what is necessary for compliance.


5. *The HCAWG should consider other ways of splitting the HCA district. *The
current option C fully complies with the HCA by allowing development only
within the Lincoln Station area. If compliance with state law is our
objective, options A and B are less appealing because they needlessly add
to option C more development potential elsewhere in town. Among the three
options, C is the obvious choice for most residents because it minimally
complies with the HCA. But the Town deserves a chance to vote on other
options that do not exceed the HCA's requirements. Three options that would
make sense are:


- Place the entire district at Lincoln Station (current option C)
- Place most of the district at Lincoln Station and some of the district
elsewhere.
- Place some of the district at Lincoln Station and most of the district
elsewhere.


For all options, the details should be worked out for minimal compliance
with the HCA, giving Lincoln residents maximum control over future land use
decisions. It's worth noting that the HCA does allow, on a discretionary
basis, subdistrict boundaries that do not match parcel boundaries. This may
provide the Town with additional flexibility it needs to comply with, but
not exceed, the HCA's requirements.


Residents deserve a meaningful, democratic chance to choose the level of
development they want in the Lincoln Station area. Due to the limited set
of options that were presented, I don't think the survey taken at the SOTT
is a good indicator of the will of the town. Surprisingly, the HCAWG did
not propose an option where some development allowed elsewhere in Town is
used to reduce the development allowed at Lincoln Station. All three of
their options allow more than 400 units of additional development in the
Lincoln Station area. That is an extreme increase compared to what
currently exists in the area. See p. 40 of SOTT slide deck.


My goal in writing this post is to encourage the HCAWG to give our Town
Meeting the respect and deference to which it is entitled. This is a hugely
important matter for the Town and we can move forward together only if Town
Meeting has a meaningful role as the decisionmaker. Please attend the
October 10th multi-board meeting to share your thoughts.


Best regards to all,
Bob Domnitz


SOTT slide deck: Follow link found in
https://www.lincolntown.org/1327/Housing-Choice-Act-Working-Group
<https://southlincolnstrong.us5.list-manage.com/track/click?u=106f5994bae83997705e61df9&id=13a5ffab02&e=cd294a1801>
Existing multifamily housing in Lincoln (not including Hanscom housing):

The Commons
Oriole Landing
Battle Road Farms
Minuteman Commons
Lincoln Woods
Greenridge Condos
"Flying Nun" apartments
Ridge Road apartments
Ridge Road Condos
Todd Pond Condos
Farrar Pond Condos
Lincoln Ridge Condos
Ryan Estate
Accessory Apartments in Single Family Homes
Miscellaneous (Scattered sites under Housing Comm.)

-- 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Barbara Peskin

*My Moments in Nature Photo Gallery: barbarapeskin.com
<http://barbarapeskin.com>*
-- 
The LincolnTalk mailing list.
To post, send mail to [email protected].
Browse the archives at https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/.
Change your subscription settings at 
https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.

Reply via email to