Rob, To clarify- the original owner of the Oriole landing property sold it for $2.225 million to Civico. Civico sold it to another owner last year after it finished development for $32.375 dollars.
The original property owners probably would have sold it for more had they known the sizable profit that Civico would be pocketing (around $10 million after development costs which they stated was 351,446 per unit). Sarah On Wed, Oct 11, 2023 at 8:29 AM Robert Ahlert <[email protected]> wrote: > Last post… > > I have encouraged the select board to create a distinct option D, which > will offer a clear alternative to option C. Clearly, from the plan to raze > single-family homes in the Codman District, there is no limitation to where > these can be put in town. They just need to be contigous subdistrict > > And at $32 million for 6 acres, I’m guessing some groups will jump at the > chance to be included in the zone. > > The people should decide, not the working group. > > Rob > > On Wed, Oct 11, 2023 at 12:00 AM Carl Angiolillo <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> I share similar questions about the percentage of affordable housing, >> overall volume, and timeline that others have already raised so I won't >> belabor those. However, I just wanted to chime in on the question of >> *location.* >> >> > What drew you here? I suspect it was the investment of previous >> generations in the preservation of fields and forest, and the trails and >> open space. >> >> Absolutely. (That and being able to live within walking distance of a >> train station, supermarket, and farm.) I hope we can all agree that any >> housing solution should preserve the fields, forests, trails, and open >> space that make Lincoln unique. >> >> From a conservation standpoint, focusing on density in areas that are >> already the most disrupted by human activity (such as Lincoln Station but >> also The Commons, Oriole Landing, Lincoln North, etc) seems like it's our >> best hope to minimize impacts to Lincoln’s fields, forests, trails, and >> open spaces. >> >> From an environmental standpoint, density near Lincoln Station has the >> additional advantage of allowing for the largest share of trips by foot, >> bike, or transit compared to any other location in town. Given the sad >> state of the MBTA this share isn't as large as it should be, but any amount >> is better than none. >> >> From a historical perspective, a dense core surrounded by open space is >> how towns developed for thousands of years before the popularization of the >> automobile. Every year more people seem to acknowledge the social, >> financial, and environmental benefits of this approach. >> >> For these reasons I believe that greenfield development with >> scattered housing units throughout the town is not a good option. >> >> Carl >> Codman Rd >> >> >> On Tue, Oct 10, 2023 at 5:02 PM Bijoy Misra <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> May I intimate people that some of the developers could be the members >>> in this group? They are carving their way monitoring this discussion. >>> A developer would like a concentrated landing and that is where we could >>> be headed through the navigation of our captains. The resistance voice >>> of >>> distribution of projects in town through a single developer or by >>> finding >>> several developers may eventually quell naturally or artificially. >>> Thought to alert! Have a good meeting. >>> Bijoy Misra >>> >>> On Tue, Oct 10, 2023 at 12:46 PM William Broughton < >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> "Developers are evil" is an oversimplification that is a convenient way >>>> to make it seem like a silly concern. What we need to be eyes wide open >>>> about is the reality that developers are not here to be our friends and >>>> keep Lincoln's best interests in mind. They are running a business, and >>>> their objective is to make a profit by building. There is nothing wrong >>>> with that at all, but we need to remember that we, the citizens and >>>> government of the town, are their checks and balances. The proposals >>>> shared, which overshoot the minimums required by the HCA, give developers a >>>> green light with a substantial amount of running room. Once that is >>>> approved, the town and residents are more restricted in ability to rein >>>> them back in. >>>> >>>> Will >>>> >>>> >>>> On Tue, Oct 10, 2023 at 10:13 AM John Mendelson < >>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> I just don't buy the "developers are evil" argument. How else do we >>>>> build without a healthy public/private development partnership? >>>>> >>>>> What do you propose to do other than nothing? >>>>> >>>>> We continue to hear arguments that our school is overbuilt and under >>>>> enrolled, our taxes are too high, etc. We've already preserved 40% of our >>>>> land in perpetuity. >>>>> >>>>> What is really at stake here? >>>>> >>>>> John >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, Oct 10, 2023 at 10:01 AM Robert Ahlert <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Developers John! Save it from Developers! I'm trying to >>>>>> illustrate the scale of what this approval could enable. I understand >>>>>> fully that Zoning does not equal Building 1:1 but why risk it? Why not >>>>>> propose a true compromise solution? >>>>>> >>>>>> You seem to think you are on high moral ground here. All you are >>>>>> doing is helping future wealthy residents - no one else! >>>>>> >>>>>> Rob >>>>>> >>>>>> On Tue, Oct 10, 2023 at 9:55 AM John Mendelson < >>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Save it from what? Progress? Working to help solve the regional >>>>>>> challenges of housing, traffic, environment? Providing housing >>>>>>> alternatives? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Or should we just continue to approve 20,000 sq/ft single family >>>>>>> houses on big lots and put our heads in the sand? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Lincoln is not an island despite what many seem to wish it could be. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> John >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Tue, Oct 10, 2023 at 9:47 AM Robert Ahlert <[email protected]> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> 1000% agree with Susanna. Well said. I have young children and >>>>>>>> want them to enjoy Lincoln as it is now, not as another Concord or >>>>>>>> Bedford >>>>>>>> or Lexington. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Lincoln is precious, save it! >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Rob >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Tue, Oct 10, 2023 at 9:41 AM Susanna Szeto <[email protected]> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> A developer’s only objective is to make money! It is not a >>>>>>>>> charitable organization who cares about providing more affordable >>>>>>>>> housing >>>>>>>>> for people! Please find one example that proves the contrary! >>>>>>>>> Regarding >>>>>>>>> 😊 ng the train to work because they live walking distance to the train >>>>>>>>> station! When we moved to Lincoln in 1977, my husband was working at >>>>>>>>> Mass >>>>>>>>> General Hospital, an ideal situation for him to take the train to >>>>>>>>> work. He >>>>>>>>> did it at the beginning and gave up the idea because for one thing, >>>>>>>>> it ends >>>>>>>>> up more costly and the train does not run often enough to give the >>>>>>>>> flexibility he needs! >>>>>>>>> Yes, we have enjoyed decades of living in Lincoln, and we want the >>>>>>>>> future generation of Lincolnites to enjoy what we have loved about >>>>>>>>> Lincoln, >>>>>>>>> the open space, the ‘low key’ nature of our town center even though >>>>>>>>> occasionally we complained we are far from everything! We care >>>>>>>>> greatly >>>>>>>>> about what will happen to Lincoln even though we both at the later >>>>>>>>> stage of >>>>>>>>> our lives! So, for the relatively newcomers to town, there are older >>>>>>>>> residents in town who do care what is going to happen to Lincoln even >>>>>>>>> though it may take decades for the developers to get their hands on >>>>>>>>> Lincoln! We have resisted them so far by using our tax dollars to >>>>>>>>> buy up >>>>>>>>> lands for conservation! There is no other town like Lincoln that is >>>>>>>>> so >>>>>>>>> close to Boston! Please do not let the developers come in to spoil >>>>>>>>> it for >>>>>>>>> us! >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Oct 9, 2023, at 11:29 PM, ٍSarah Postlethwait <[email protected]> >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> All very well voiced points! >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> But make no mistake- do not be fooled by the voices saying "potential >>>>>>>>> development will take decades". >>>>>>>>> If option C of this rezoning gets passed, development will begin >>>>>>>>> immediately. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> *The HCAWG and the RLF are directly working with Civico, the >>>>>>>>> developer of Oriole Landing*. Civico isn’t working with the town >>>>>>>>> because it likes us and is a trusted town partner… it wants to make >>>>>>>>> money. >>>>>>>>> Civico has threatened the town by saying it will not go through >>>>>>>>> the town meeting process again after it did so with Oriole Landing. >>>>>>>>> The >>>>>>>>> pro-building HCAWG (which includes the Executive Director of the RLF >>>>>>>>> as a >>>>>>>>> member) wants Civico to develop. >>>>>>>>> So in turn, the HCAWG and Planning board added mixed Use Zoning at >>>>>>>>> Lincoln Center to this proposal so it wouldn’t be necessary for them >>>>>>>>> to go >>>>>>>>> through the traditional town meeting process. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> This gives Civico the chance to push a high cost, high density >>>>>>>>> housing complex (125 units), with only 10% affordable housing (we >>>>>>>>> required >>>>>>>>> 15% with Oriole landing). And it’s more likely to be passed because >>>>>>>>> *only >>>>>>>>> a simple majority is needed under the HCA instead of the usual 2/3 >>>>>>>>> majority >>>>>>>>> at town meeting*; not to mention, the HCAWG is making it seem >>>>>>>>> like a looming lawsuit and loss of grants are eminent to encourage >>>>>>>>> residents to pass the rezoning. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Let me emphasize again- if Civico develops this Subdistrict, it >>>>>>>>> will be 112 units at market rate and 13 units of affordable housing. >>>>>>>>> *Market >>>>>>>>> rate for Oriole Landing is currently $4,000 to $8,500 without >>>>>>>>> utilities,* >>>>>>>>> according to their listing on Apartments.com. >>>>>>>>> That is not affordable housing for anyone who wants to downsize or >>>>>>>>> work in Lincoln, as many seem to be under the impression this >>>>>>>>> development >>>>>>>>> would help. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> A slide from the presentation: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> <69012668-7F39-478C-B8C4-134AB43AB1A5.jpeg> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> <75467D4B-940C-4471-880D-5A25ED122A3D.jpeg> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Mon, Oct 9, 2023 at 9:15 PM William Broughton < >>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Thank you Bob and Rob, among many others, for the helpful >>>>>>>>>> insights. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I have a number of concerns with the currently proposed HCA >>>>>>>>>> options. The impacts to affordable housing in town (both absolute >>>>>>>>>> number >>>>>>>>>> and percentage of total), traffic, and finances (taxes) are just a >>>>>>>>>> few. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> As another resident mentioned in a separate thread, the potential >>>>>>>>>> for areas like Lincoln Woods, with a higher % of affordable housing >>>>>>>>>> units, >>>>>>>>>> to one day be redeveloped and, despite an increase in total number of >>>>>>>>>> housing units, result in a net decrease in the town's number of >>>>>>>>>> affordable >>>>>>>>>> units, is concerning. If we can only mandate that 10% of new housing >>>>>>>>>> units >>>>>>>>>> (in the HCA zone) must be affordable, and the 40b threshold for the >>>>>>>>>> town is >>>>>>>>>> also 10%, doesn't that imply that the town's overall ratio would get >>>>>>>>>> closer >>>>>>>>>> and closer to being under the threshold with each new development >>>>>>>>>> that is >>>>>>>>>> built? What will that result in - yet more development? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Further, the argument that the entire district needs to be near >>>>>>>>>> the commuter rail station does not make sense to me. The commuter >>>>>>>>>> rail is, >>>>>>>>>> at its best, inconvenient and expensive, and at its worst it is both >>>>>>>>>> of >>>>>>>>>> those things, plus unreliable. The traffic study that was shared, in >>>>>>>>>> my >>>>>>>>>> opinion, grossly understates the potential impact of the additional >>>>>>>>>> vehicles resulting from the additional development. The reality is >>>>>>>>>> that >>>>>>>>>> most people, unless they live in perhaps >>>>>>>>>> Boston/Cambridge/Somerville, use >>>>>>>>>> cars for much of their daily lives. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> It also pains me to hear, from multiple individuals, that the >>>>>>>>>> "potential development will take decades". I'm a relatively new and >>>>>>>>>> young homeowner in Lincoln. I intend to be here in the future >>>>>>>>>> "decades" >>>>>>>>>> referenced, and I hope to get to enjoy Lincoln with my children in >>>>>>>>>> much the >>>>>>>>>> same way so many current residents have over the past several >>>>>>>>>> decades. >>>>>>>>>> These choices we make today will have big impacts, and we can also >>>>>>>>>> be sure >>>>>>>>>> that this will not be the last effort by the Commonwealth to force >>>>>>>>>> additional development in the decades to come. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I look forward to the continued lively debate among residents and >>>>>>>>>> the various working groups, but it feels like there is much more >>>>>>>>>> that needs >>>>>>>>>> to be explored before we can have a "final" proposal. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Best, >>>>>>>>>> Will Broughton >>>>>>>>>> Round Hill Rd >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Oct 6, 2023 at 2:32 PM Robert Ahlert <[email protected]> >>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Thank goodness you are paying attention Bob! >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> The HCA feels like a juggernaut and options were clearly favored >>>>>>>>>>> towards “all near Lincoln station”. I have a long series of >>>>>>>>>>> unanswered >>>>>>>>>>> questions. I hope to get answers and publish them all on a >>>>>>>>>>> blog/website >>>>>>>>>>> that everyone can read. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I’ll need help to put it together and get answers. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> If anyone is even slightly concerned about what is happening >>>>>>>>>>> with the HCA in Lincoln, please email me privately or text me on >>>>>>>>>>> 781.738.1069. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Rob A >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Oct 6, 2023 at 1:30 PM Robert Domnitz < >>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> As a recently-retired member of the Planning Board and Housing >>>>>>>>>>>> Choice Act Working Group, I am concerned that the three options >>>>>>>>>>>> presented >>>>>>>>>>>> last Saturday at the SOTT - and the plan to choose just one of >>>>>>>>>>>> those >>>>>>>>>>>> options at a multi-board meeting on October 10th - will restrict >>>>>>>>>>>> Town >>>>>>>>>>>> Meeting to merely rubber-stamping the HCAWG's decision. And the >>>>>>>>>>>> HCAWG's >>>>>>>>>>>> decision will reflect its embedded priorities that may differ from >>>>>>>>>>>> what >>>>>>>>>>>> town meeting would choose if we are given more options. I >>>>>>>>>>>> therefore think >>>>>>>>>>>> it is crucial for the HCAWG to submit several options to the state >>>>>>>>>>>> for >>>>>>>>>>>> advisory opinions prior to Town Meeting. All options should be >>>>>>>>>>>> presented to >>>>>>>>>>>> Town Meeting for debate and vote. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> I'd like to expand on some of the points made - and some of the >>>>>>>>>>>> points omitted - by the presenters at last Saturday's SOTT meeting. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> 1. *About 35% of the town's residences are currently >>>>>>>>>>>> multi-family* (not including Hanscom Field, see list below). >>>>>>>>>>>> Most folks are surprised when they hear this. Lincoln has done an >>>>>>>>>>>> outstanding job allowing multi-family living while maintaining our >>>>>>>>>>>> rural >>>>>>>>>>>> character. With full build-out under the HCA, multi-family housing >>>>>>>>>>>> will >>>>>>>>>>>> approach 50% of the town's inventory. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> 2. *State guidelines for the HCA provide a mechanism for towns >>>>>>>>>>>> to **get** credit for existing multifamily housing.* Towns are >>>>>>>>>>>> free to locate HCA-compliant subdistricts in areas that currently >>>>>>>>>>>> have high >>>>>>>>>>>> residential density. These subdistricts will help us meet our >>>>>>>>>>>> "quota," even >>>>>>>>>>>> though it is very unlikely these areas will be redeveloped. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> 3. *An evaluation of the various options requires >>>>>>>>>>>> consideration of the likelihood that redevelopment will **actually >>>>>>>>>>>> **occur.* Existing condo developments would require consent of >>>>>>>>>>>> the owners to redevelop, with the particular procedures laid out >>>>>>>>>>>> in the >>>>>>>>>>>> condominiums' organizational documents. If condo owners don't >>>>>>>>>>>> want redevelopment to happen, it won't happen. Existing >>>>>>>>>>>> apartment buildings (e.g., Oriole Landing) owned by a single >>>>>>>>>>>> entity would >>>>>>>>>>>> only require a decision by that entity and would depend on their >>>>>>>>>>>> analysis >>>>>>>>>>>> of whether an increase in density would justify the cost of >>>>>>>>>>>> redevelopment. >>>>>>>>>>>> On the other hand, rezoning single family homes on Conant Road as >>>>>>>>>>>> shown in >>>>>>>>>>>> options A,B, and C from the HCAWG would likely result in rapid >>>>>>>>>>>> redevelopment, as owners on Conant Road take advantage of the jump >>>>>>>>>>>> in value that would result from the increase in development >>>>>>>>>>>> potential. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> 4. *State guidelines require that only 20% of the >>>>>>>>>>>> HCA-compliant district be located in the vicinity of the commuter >>>>>>>>>>>> rail >>>>>>>>>>>> station*. The other 80% can be anywhere in town. However, the >>>>>>>>>>>> HCAWG eliminated consideration of the Farrar Pond and Lincoln >>>>>>>>>>>> Ridge condos >>>>>>>>>>>> as "too far from any amenities and public transit." See link below >>>>>>>>>>>> to p. 17 >>>>>>>>>>>> of SOTT slide deck. This area could be used as part of our plan for >>>>>>>>>>>> compliance; the HCAWG's decision to eliminate consideration of >>>>>>>>>>>> this area >>>>>>>>>>>> reflects their prioritization of access to public transit and goes >>>>>>>>>>>> beyond >>>>>>>>>>>> what the state requires. Similarly, the Commons/Oriole Landing >>>>>>>>>>>> area was >>>>>>>>>>>> removed from consideration by the HCAWG because it is "not >>>>>>>>>>>> walkable to any >>>>>>>>>>>> public transit or public amenities." See p. 20 of SOTT slide deck. >>>>>>>>>>>> Instead, >>>>>>>>>>>> the HCAWG has proposed placing 100% of the district in Lincoln >>>>>>>>>>>> Station >>>>>>>>>>>> (option C) or adding to option C additional subdistricts in North >>>>>>>>>>>> Lincoln >>>>>>>>>>>> so that the total development potential greatly exceeds what is >>>>>>>>>>>> necessary >>>>>>>>>>>> for compliance. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> 5. *The HCAWG should consider other ways of splitting the HCA >>>>>>>>>>>> district. *The current option C fully complies with the HCA by >>>>>>>>>>>> allowing development only within the Lincoln Station area. If >>>>>>>>>>>> compliance >>>>>>>>>>>> with state law is our objective, options A and B are less >>>>>>>>>>>> appealing because >>>>>>>>>>>> they needlessly add to option C more development potential >>>>>>>>>>>> elsewhere in >>>>>>>>>>>> town. Among the three options, C is the obvious choice for most >>>>>>>>>>>> residents >>>>>>>>>>>> because it minimally complies with the HCA. But the Town deserves >>>>>>>>>>>> a chance >>>>>>>>>>>> to vote on other options that do not exceed the HCA's >>>>>>>>>>>> requirements. Three >>>>>>>>>>>> options that would make sense are: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> - Place the entire district at Lincoln Station (current option >>>>>>>>>>>> C) >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> - Place most of the district at Lincoln Station and some of the >>>>>>>>>>>> district elsewhere. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> - Place some of the district at Lincoln Station and most of the >>>>>>>>>>>> district elsewhere. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> For all options, the details should be worked out for minimal >>>>>>>>>>>> compliance with the HCA, giving Lincoln residents maximum control >>>>>>>>>>>> over >>>>>>>>>>>> future land use decisions. It's worth noting that the HCA does >>>>>>>>>>>> allow, on a >>>>>>>>>>>> discretionary basis, subdistrict boundaries that do not match >>>>>>>>>>>> parcel >>>>>>>>>>>> boundaries. This may provide the Town with additional flexibility >>>>>>>>>>>> it needs >>>>>>>>>>>> to comply with, but not exceed, the HCA's requirements. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Residents deserve a meaningful, democratic chance to choose the >>>>>>>>>>>> level of development they want in the Lincoln Station area. Due to >>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>> limited set of options that were presented, I don't think the >>>>>>>>>>>> survey taken >>>>>>>>>>>> at the SOTT is a good indicator of the will of the town. >>>>>>>>>>>> Surprisingly, the >>>>>>>>>>>> HCAWG did not propose an option where some development allowed >>>>>>>>>>>> elsewhere in >>>>>>>>>>>> Town is used to reduce the development allowed at Lincoln Station. >>>>>>>>>>>> All >>>>>>>>>>>> three of their options allow more than 400 units of additional >>>>>>>>>>>> development >>>>>>>>>>>> in the Lincoln Station area. That is an extreme increase compared >>>>>>>>>>>> to what >>>>>>>>>>>> currently exists in the area. See p. 40 of SOTT slide deck. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> My goal in writing this post is to encourage the HCAWG to give >>>>>>>>>>>> our Town Meeting the respect and deference to which it is >>>>>>>>>>>> entitled. This is >>>>>>>>>>>> a hugely important matter for the Town and we can move forward >>>>>>>>>>>> together >>>>>>>>>>>> only if Town Meeting has a meaningful role as the decisionmaker. >>>>>>>>>>>> Please >>>>>>>>>>>> attend the October 10th multi-board meeting to share your thoughts. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards to all, >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Bob Domnitz >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> SOTT slide deck: Follow link found in >>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.lincolntown.org/1327/Housing-Choice-Act-Working-Group >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Existing multifamily housing in Lincoln (not including Hanscom >>>>>>>>>>>> housing): >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> The Commons >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Oriole Landing >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Battle Road Farms >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Minuteman Commons >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Lincoln Woods >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Greenridge Condos >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> "Flying Nun" apartments >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Ridge Road apartments >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Ridge Road Condos >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Todd Pond Condos >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Farrar Pond Condos >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Lincoln Ridge Condos >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Ryan Estate >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Accessory Apartments in Single Family Homes >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Miscellaneous (Scattered sites under Housing Comm.) >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>> The LincolnTalk mailing list. >>>>>>>>>>>> To post, send mail to [email protected]. >>>>>>>>>>>> Browse the archives at >>>>>>>>>>>> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/. >>>>>>>>>>>> Change your subscription settings at >>>>>>>>>>>> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>> The LincolnTalk mailing list. >>>>>>>>>>> To post, send mail to [email protected]. >>>>>>>>>>> Browse the archives at >>>>>>>>>>> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/. >>>>>>>>>>> Change your subscription settings at >>>>>>>>>>> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>> The LincolnTalk mailing list. >>>>>>>>>> To post, send mail to [email protected]. >>>>>>>>>> Browse the archives at >>>>>>>>>> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/. >>>>>>>>>> Change your subscription settings at >>>>>>>>>> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>> The LincolnTalk mailing list. >>>>>>>>> To post, send mail to [email protected]. >>>>>>>>> Browse the archives at >>>>>>>>> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/. >>>>>>>>> Change your subscription settings at >>>>>>>>> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>> The LincolnTalk mailing list. >>>>>>>>> To post, send mail to [email protected]. >>>>>>>>> Browse the archives at >>>>>>>>> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/. >>>>>>>>> Change your subscription settings at >>>>>>>>> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> *Robert Ahlert* | *781.738.1069* | [email protected] >>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> The LincolnTalk mailing list. >>>>>>>> To post, send mail to [email protected]. >>>>>>>> Browse the archives at >>>>>>>> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/. >>>>>>>> Change your subscription settings at >>>>>>>> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> *Robert Ahlert* | *781.738.1069* | [email protected] >>>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> The LincolnTalk mailing list. >>>>> To post, send mail to [email protected]. >>>>> Browse the archives at >>>>> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/. >>>>> Change your subscription settings at >>>>> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln. >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>> The LincolnTalk mailing list. >>>> To post, send mail to [email protected]. >>>> Browse the archives at >>>> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/. >>>> Change your subscription settings at >>>> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln. >>> >>> >>>> >>>> -- >>> The LincolnTalk mailing list. >>> To post, send mail to [email protected]. >>> Browse the archives at >>> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/. >>> Change your subscription settings at >>> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln. >>> >>> -- >> The LincolnTalk mailing list. >> To post, send mail to [email protected]. >> Browse the archives at >> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/. >> Change your subscription settings at >> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln. >> >> -- > The LincolnTalk mailing list. > To post, send mail to [email protected]. > Browse the archives at https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/ > . > Change your subscription settings at > https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln. > >
-- The LincolnTalk mailing list. To post, send mail to [email protected]. Browse the archives at https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/. Change your subscription settings at https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.
