Let's not conflate the RLF finances with the Mall finances.

The 990 filings indicate that the Mall itself has been consistently
profitable over the last five  years
<https://projects.propublica.org/nonprofits/organizations/46132391/202222509349300837/full>
:

   - 2018: $80,399
   - 2019: $191,279
   - 2020: $122,519
   - 2021: $111,795
   - 2022: $164,571

In terms of the RLF finances, if there is a concern about its
sustainability, perhaps there should be a reflection about its cost
structure. I would like to point out that Concord Land Conservation Trust,
which oversees double the acreage (more than 1,000 vs more than 500 acres
in Lincoln), has expenses of $187K versus $334K for the RLF/LLCT
<https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1rFLf4j0m6zzM3qOox3b_I0xDz2RCX0Bxxw_W8msll_A/edit>
.

On Sun, Nov 12, 2023 at 2:06 PM Rich Rosenbaum <[email protected]> wrote:

> Given the history of businesses leaving the mall, $165k seems to be a thin
> margin for predicting future rental profitability.
>
> It might be noted that rental income is only part of the RLF financials.
> Their overall net seems to be $212,000 for 2022 and -$251,431 (loss) for
> the prior year. That doesn't paint a picture of financial stability to me.
>
> Rich
> (not an accountant, either)
>
> On Sun, Nov 12, 2023 at 10:07 AM Karla Gravis <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> I want to emphasize that the Mall is currently a profitable concern.The
>> RLF disclosed a rental profit of $164,571 in 2022. Details here
>> <https://projects.propublica.org/nonprofits/organizations/46132391/202341749349301024/full>.
>> However, if we rezone it by right, Civico would get to decide what
>> mix of commercial and residential to build. As a private enterprise, they
>> will choose to build whatever leads to the highest profits, which we know
>> is residential. Ms. Barnes mentioned that commercial space will be
>> reduced during the forum on Wednesday. We have no guarantees that Civico
>> would maintain Donelan's or any of the existing commercial space. This
>> outcome would be at odds with our goal of supporting our commercial center
>> and reducing the town's carbon footprint. This is one of the reasons why it
>> is so important that the Mall redevelopment goes through Town Meeting.
>>
>> It is also important to puncture the myth that building units at Lincoln
>> Station would do much to boost the commercial prospects of the area:
>>
>>    - The Planning Board released a Lincoln Station Planning Study in
>>    2014. The study concluded that each 100 units added would only support
>>    2,500 sq ft of space. For reference, Donelan's footprint is 20,387 sq ft.
>>    Study  here
>>    
>> <https://www.lincolntown.org/DocumentCenter/View/65765/Lincoln-Station-Planning-Study-3-27-2014bwfinal>
>>    - 2,500 sq ft of commercial space per 100 units is probably a very
>>    optimistic number. The Study assumed that the leakage (% of convenience
>>    buys by residents that happen outside of Lincoln Station) would come down
>>    from 80% to 50%. If we use the actual 80% leakage, those 100 units would
>>    only support 1,000 sq ft of space.
>>    - In all likelihood the leakage is actually higher than 80% today
>>    given the increased penetration of online sales in the nine years elapsed.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
-- 
The LincolnTalk mailing list.
To post, send mail to [email protected].
Browse the archives at https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/.
Change your subscription settings at 
https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.

Reply via email to