The important point to remember is that "transit" in Lincoln is not an operational word. So we should negotiate with the State to rectify the system for timely operation and then think of the idea of bringing people to station. I don't see any planning in our work and that bothers me. The WG has spent time and created some maps, but those are unfortunately misdirected. Given the current situation, Lincoln is not a MBTA "transit" station. It can be said that lack of passengers make the commuter train inefficient. But that has to be addressed in the infrastructure development by the State. Flooding people at the station will cause misery to life elsewhere. So we should reject HCA now and write to State why. We should create housing in town and leave the station open. The state should address the commuter issue and we add housing at the Station. Best regards, Bijoy Misra
On Wed, Nov 15, 2023 at 6:48 PM Sara Mattes <[email protected]> wrote: > All, > What is instructive is to remember, we are struggling with how best to > comply-to add housing near transit, to bring more traffic to the retail at > the Mall, and to balance that with maintaining small town character. > It is a give and take discussion-there is no simple answer, except that > (from my perspective) no new housing and no new development and “no > compliance” is not an option. > > What is all very instructions is to see how our neighbors are managing > these challenges. > It can be done by going to the websites of each town-lexington, Concord, > Weston etc. > > And, it is import to note the important outcome of the Brookline vote- the > compromises and consensus made by all parties. > > It is necessary to really dig in and not fall prey to broad and sweeping > statements and/or labeling of any party weighing in on this debate. > > We are a community and we need to find a path that will allow us to come > out of these great debates as one. > > Best, > Sara > > > > > > > > ------ > Sara Mattes > > > > > On Nov 15, 2023, at 12:00 PM, Eben Holderness via Lincoln < > [email protected]> wrote: > > Someone correct me if I’m wrong, but I think it’s worth clarifying that > despite what some have indicated in recent discussions, there are not “many > neighboring towns” rejecting the HCA. In fact, of the 177 towns/cities that > fall under the law, I can only identify one town, Holden, that continues to > reject the law (several other communities that missed the initial 1/2023 > deadline to submit a zoning plan have since submitted theirs and are now in > compliance). Holden’s situation is — one could argue — a bit unique in that > they have no MBTA service within the town boundary (and indeed, the town > manager did initially claim that they “didn’t realize” they were considered > an MBTA community). It’s also worth noting that Holden is now being sued by > the Central MA Housing Alliance for non-compliance, and the MA attorney > general’s office has indicated they intend to as well. > > While I begrudgingly support adding a “None of the Above” option to the > December ballot, I think it’s foolhardy to even consider an outright > rejection of the HCA. Do we really want to lose access to millions in > grants while also becoming “that town” that is resisting any and all change? > > Best, > Eben > > On Nov 14, 2023, at 11:39 PM, Bijoy Misra <[email protected]> wrote: > > Dear friends, > It seems that there are some vocal members in HCAWG who are > deeply concerned about the housing crisis in the State and would > like to let the town volunteer itself to help alleviate the problem. > This is a noble thought and I for one would strongly endorse > such a view. Many other friends are not averse to it either. > What we have been saying, as i said four years ago, that the > housing develop at Lincoln Center should be determined by > the town public and not through passion or emotion. Real estate > once developed becomes a fixture. The town center should be > owned by the townspeople rather than a third party developer. > I beg the Select Board to encourage development but exclude > town center. Let any center development be properly planned > with an eye to traffic, transport, schools, playground and > affordability. There are options created by the young analysts > that would fit in 20% station (Codman Road) and 80% off station > (North Cambridge). > The town center planning through the previous SLIPAC > was rejected by the neighbors and the public. I suggest to give > an open invitation to townspeople to join in planning. > An elderly gentleman did report about the rejection of HCA by > many neighboring towns. I hear the loss to the town is minimal > compared to huge potential gain in affordable housing and the > control of land. > My request is to create an option of Reject HCA, which should > have been in the ballot anyway. > Best regards, > Bijoy Misra > > -- > The LincolnTalk mailing list. > To post, send mail to [email protected]. > Browse the archives at https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/ > . > Change your subscription settings at > https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln. > > > -- > The LincolnTalk mailing list. > To post, send mail to [email protected]. > Browse the archives at https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/ > . > Change your subscription settings at > https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln. > > >
-- The LincolnTalk mailing list. To post, send mail to [email protected]. Browse the archives at https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/. Change your subscription settings at https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.
