Are you confirming that 100’ setbacks from wetlands will be accepted as 
required in HCA zoned areas as they are in the rest of town?
Please clarify.
Thank you.

------
Sara Mattes




> On Nov 22, 2023, at 3:53 PM, Margaret Olson <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Zoning bylaws cannot be bypassed except by “40b” development. Lincoln is not 
> subject to 40b as our SHI (subsidized housing index) is above 10%. Again, our 
> zoning and wetland bylaws and regulations cannot be bypassed. Compliance with 
> the HCA requires us modify the zoning for the HCA districts but all other 
> regulations stand.
> 
> On Wed, Nov 22, 2023 at 1:58 PM Scott Clary <[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>> Hello Lis,
>> 
>> I am curious what what your definition of "meaningful density" 
>> (specifically, how many units). I've been paying fairly close attention and 
>> I've seen very few who are against complying with HCA and do not want to see 
>> any redevelopment of the mall/station area. To the contrary, I have mostly 
>> seen and heard residents advocating for redevelopment to include 
>> retail/commercial, mixed use and residential. 
>> 
>> But what would be the rationale for Lincoln residents to turn over the keys 
>> to the mall to a developer with "by right" zoning and having no say to 
>> affect the outcome. Most notably, maximum 10% affordability under HCA as 
>> opposed to 25% affordability we've always negotiated with developers as a 
>> town. If I have this right, affordability in Lincoln requires a family 
>> income of $116,000 (80% of of the median of $145,000). Some will argue that 
>> we can offset these numbers with our Housing Trust funds but wouldn't those 
>> funds be better used subsidizing those who really need it and not those 
>> earning $116,000?
>> 
>> With all due respect to the newly appointed Transportation secretary, she is 
>> not going to wave a magic wand and fix a dysfunctional MBTA which has been 
>> dysfunctional for many years at the price tag of 24 billion dollars. It also 
>> takes legislation and what has legislation done to keep the MBTA functional 
>> to date? It is, I believe, short-sighted to think otherwise and that 
>> building excessively high density housing (the state model allows for max of 
>> 1125 and minimum of 635 housing units increasing our current housing stock 
>> count by a minimum of 25% +, by far the the most in the Commonwealth) ALL at 
>> the train station/mall with a decreased retail/commercial base is not going 
>> to solve much
>> except dramatically change the landscape of that area and give Developers by 
>> right zoning. And as we learned yesterday at the planning board meeting, 
>> they are planning four story buildings for some sub districts, not just 
>> three story buildings as we had been previously informed. And please don't 
>> forget that it is proposed that our zoning bylaws can be bypassed in the 
>> form of 100 ft Wetland setback to 50 ft Wetland set back and negating our 
>> 25% max lot coverage and our building height Max of 36 ft and Frontage 
>> setbacks of 15 ft as opposed to current 25 ft, our current by law in other 
>> districts.
>> 
>> Kind Regards,
>> 
>> Scott Clary
>> 617-968-5769
>> 
>> Sent from a mobile device - please excuse typos and errors   
>> 
>> On Tue, Nov 21, 2023, 7:14 PM Lis Herbert <[email protected] 
>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>> I grew up riding Metro-North, and I understand that by comparison the 
>>> Fitchburg line is not great. The frequency is a problem, and that in large 
>>> part dictates the degree to which people depend on it, and their attitude 
>>> towards it.
>>> 
>>> But it’s not getting any better if we don’t comply. I think we can be sure 
>>> of that, both because the demand won’t be sufficient, and we’ll have 
>>> thumbed our noses at the idea of being a mass transit-oriented community.
>>> 
>>> It’s not clear to me how somebody can wish for improvements to the commuter 
>>> rail in Lincoln and not see that concentrating density around the train is 
>>> the answer. (I’m not saying you’re a somebody, by the way, just pointing 
>>> out that I’ve heard plenty of people trying to play both sides of the coin.)
>>> 
>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>> 
>>>> On Nov 21, 2023, at 6:25 PM, V Saleme <[email protected] 
>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Those of us who commuted into the city for work from here, have been 
>>>> waiting for decades for improvements, frequency of service and reliability 
>>>> to occur. 
>>>> 
>>>> The waiting continues.
>>>> 
>>>> Vic
>>>> 
>>>> On Tue, Nov 21, 2023 at 6:09 PM Lis Herbert <[email protected] 
>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>>>> Nowhere does it say that the train has to stop in Lincoln. We might not 
>>>>> have a sense for how the state plans to approach the MBTA shortfalls, but 
>>>>> I think it's a certainty that unless Lincoln demonstrates a commitment to 
>>>>> meaningful density around the station, we can bet against improvements in 
>>>>> service and frequency for Lincoln commuters. I hope we can all at least 
>>>>> agree that improvements aren't happening if we vote to avoid rezoning 
>>>>> much of that area in favor of car-centric development (that will, let's 
>>>>> be honest, not happen) located (according to Google maps) an 8 mile, 15 
>>>>> minute drive away. 
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Tue, Nov 21, 2023 at 5:33 PM Peter Buchthal <[email protected] 
>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> While I am happy to see some recognition that our MBTA needs investment, 
>>>>>>  I would like to point out the magnitude  and likelihood of the dollars 
>>>>>> we are talking about.  Regrettably, we are many, many years away from a 
>>>>>> properly functioning and reliable MBTA and commuter rail in Lincoln.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> According to the Boston Globe:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> "The MBTA needs a gobsmacking $24.5 billion to repair and replace its 
>>>>>> decrepit track, stations, trains, signals, and other assets, an agency 
>>>>>> analysis released Thursday shows, providing the long-awaited tally of 
>>>>>> how broken the transit system is."
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> "The next most expensive is the commuter rail system, at about $8 
>>>>>> billion, with the bulk of investment needed for stations, followed by 
>>>>>> the Green and Mattapan lines — which need $4.7 billion."
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> List to the article:
>>>>>> https://www.bostonglobe.com/2023/11/16/metro/cost-to-fix-mbta/
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Tue, Nov 21, 2023 at 10:55 AM DJCP <[email protected] 
>>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>>>>>> After she was appointed permanent Transportation Secretary last week, 
>>>>>>> Monica Tibbits-Nutt directly stated on Radio Boston that the 
>>>>>>> Commonwealth would invest in communities that build around Commuter 
>>>>>>> Rail stations.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> At about 7:10 in the segment linked here, Tiziana specifically asks 
>>>>>>> about HCA, and at 8:50 the Secretary says Mass. will put the money 
>>>>>>> where "the cities and towns do what needs to be done": 
>>>>>>> https://www.wbur.org/radioboston/2023/11/13/monica-tibbits-nutt-massdot-sagamore-bourne-tobin-mbta-sumner
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> At 5:20, the Secretary also talks about how the "inner core" needs to 
>>>>>>> invest in housing so we can invest more in connecting places like 
>>>>>>> Worcester.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> I think the whole segment is worth listening to, as she directly links 
>>>>>>> housing to transportation.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Diana
>>>>>>> Giles Rd
>>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>>> The LincolnTalk mailing list.
>>>>>>> To post, send mail to [email protected] 
>>>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>.
>>>>>>> Browse the archives at 
>>>>>>> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/.
>>>>>>> Change your subscription settings at 
>>>>>>> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>> The LincolnTalk mailing list.
>>>>>> To post, send mail to [email protected] 
>>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>.
>>>>>> Browse the archives at 
>>>>>> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/.
>>>>>> Change your subscription settings at 
>>>>>> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.
>>>>>> 
>>>>> -- 
>>>>> The LincolnTalk mailing list.
>>>>> To post, send mail to [email protected] 
>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>.
>>>>> Browse the archives at 
>>>>> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/.
>>>>> Change your subscription settings at 
>>>>> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.
>>>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> The LincolnTalk mailing list.
>>> To post, send mail to [email protected] 
>>> <mailto:[email protected]>.
>>> Browse the archives at https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/.
>>> Change your subscription settings at 
>>> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.
>>> 
>> -- 
>> The LincolnTalk mailing list.
>> To post, send mail to [email protected] 
>> <mailto:[email protected]>.
>> Browse the archives at https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/.
>> Change your subscription settings at 
>> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.
>> 
> -- 
> The LincolnTalk mailing list.
> To post, send mail to [email protected].
> Browse the archives at https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/.
> Change your subscription settings at 
> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.
> 

-- 
The LincolnTalk mailing list.
To post, send mail to [email protected].
Browse the archives at https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/.
Change your subscription settings at 
https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.

Reply via email to