The proposed Farrington deal is a deeply flawed compromise that hinges on the construction of 20 single-family homes. To make way for this development, the plan would:
Clear-cut a forested area on Farrington’s land (see photo), and Install a massive 20-home septic system at the highest elevation on the property. This leach field would pose a serious, long-term threat to the wetlands below—an ecologically vital area that serves as a tributary to the Cambridge watershed. The good news? These 20 houses don’t need to be built. There is already enough funding available to compensate Farrington for placing a conservation restriction on the land. The only rationale offered for purchasing the Panetta property and moving forward with development is to provide Farrington with improved access. But there’s a smarter, cleaner solution. With just a modest additional investment—$250,000, a figure taken from a study commissioned by Farrington and adjusted for construction cost inflation—Farrington could enhance its road access to Route 2. This would provide far better access than Page Road, while eliminating the need for environmentally damaging development. If Cambridge and Lincoln each contribute $1 million, just a little bit more than they are already being asked for, they would cover this $250,000. The path forward is obvious: conserve the land, protect the watershed, and avoid irreversible harm. This is a rare opportunity to do the right thing—for nature, for the community, and for future generations. Iwona Dobler 103 Page Rd
-- The LincolnTalk mailing list. To post, send mail to [email protected]. Browse the archives at https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/. Change your subscription settings at https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.
