This isn’t about opposing housing or conservation. It’s about making sure
Lincoln gets a fair, transparent deal, that truly balances housing
diversity, neighborhood impact, and responsible land use. To that end, here
are five key facts that voters deserve to know about the Nature Link
Proposal:

   1. Conservation need not be tied to this housing deal

The proposed zoning change links limited conservation gains to a permanent
development easement, but this tradeoff is not inevitable.

   -

   Farrington could apply directly to the state for Route 2 access, a
   process that takes no more than 40 business days, instead of relying on a
   permanent easement across the Panetta land. [See here
   
<https://docs.google.com/document/d/1NQgym_rT_RQ9qKMhRSTr92i8WWD9IoqRIc7nSdBTzCM/edit?tab=t.0>
   ].
   -

   A better deal, one that protects more of Farrington’s dry upland, could
   have been proposed and still can be. Lincoln has not been presented with
   meaningful alternatives.



   2.

   Most of the "Conserved" Land Was Never at Risk

Based on the town's GIS map, of the 77 acres being placed under
conservation, fewer than 20 are buildable. The rest are wetlands already
subject to environmental protection. [See an estimate here
<https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1nc0gBbIZ2STyfg8bcXD5YnpIE2r3IqZP>]

   -

   As part of this deal, over one third of Farrington’s usable land (about
   10 acres) will be cleared for housing and septic infrastructure.
   -

   Before committing public money, we should be asking the project sponsors
   to carry out a wetland delineation exercise, which will help us
   determine the project’s true payout.
   -

   The project will also create a 14-acre Nitrogen-Restricted Area, where
   water quality is especially vulnerable to pollution from on-site sewage
   systems.
   -

   The trail on Farrington’s property is neither new nor 1.5 miles long.
   Despite promotional claims, the trail is not a new amenity. It already
   exists and is merely being “officialized.” Its actual length is only 0.7
   miles. [See proof here
   <https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1nc0gBbIZ2STyfg8bcXD5YnpIE2r3IqZP>
   ].



   3.

   Town Money Is Enabling a Private Land Transfer

Although town funds don’t go directly to the developer, they enable a land
transfer to Civico that otherwise wouldn’t happen.

   -

   The town will pay $950,000 to Farrington, which is granting Civico land
   for five units and a septic system serving 20 homes.

   -

   Civico is paying only the assessed value of $3.3 million for the Panetta
   parcel, a price that would typically allow just three homes under current
   zoning.

   -

   This amounts to an indirect public subsidy of private development.


   4. This is not “mixed-income housing” by Lincoln’s standards

Of the 20 homes:

   -

   14 will likely sell for $1.1 million or more

   -

   3 for around $400,000 (affordable units)

   -

   3 for over $2 million


The $990,000 “average price” estimate for the smaller homes appears crafted
to suggest they’ll sell for “under a million”, but these figures aren’t
binding and offer no affordability guarantee.

   -

   For context: Lincoln’s median home price is $1.1 million. This
   development does not expand the price range of local housing in any
   meaningful way. [Comparable sales data available here
   
<https://docs.google.com/document/d/1NQgym_rT_RQ9qKMhRSTr92i8WWD9IoqRIc7nSdBTzCM/edit?tab=t.0>
   ].

   -

   Also, only one teardown has occurred in Lincoln in the past two years,
   according to the building commissioner. Claims of disappearing affordable
   homes are overstated.


   5. This development is pitting neighbors against each other

Residents near Route 2 and the Panetta land will bear the brunt of
increased density and disruption. Meanwhile, residents further down Page
Road who abut Farrington benefit from new conservation restrictions behind
their homes.

   -

   The Farrington abutters were involved in early planning discussions, long
   before the public was informed, and are now among the strongest
   supporters of the deal.

   -

   This raises serious questions about fairness and public process.


David Cuetos
Weston Rd
-- 
The LincolnTalk mailing list.
To post, send mail to [email protected].
Browse the archives at https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/.
Change your subscription settings at 
https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.

Reply via email to