I don’t believe every angle of the deal has yet been surfaced. Given the
rushed nature of the process, we keep learning new information that
substantially changes the dynamic of the decision. For example, the recent
mailer that Civico sent to our homes show *that the leaching field from the
septic will be approximately 14 acres, all on Farrington land. *This is in
addition to the 2 acres that Farrington would give to Civico for housing
and Farrington’s own building envelope.

What this means is that, from the town’s standpoint, this is not a good
deal. It would involve using taxpayer funds earmarked for preservation
to *enable
the degradation of 18 acres of dryland, half of Farrington’s total dryland,
through a combination of cut-clearing for development and use as a septic
leaching field.*

Accepting such a compromise, when a better outcome is clearly within reach
for both the town and Farrington, would be a failure of responsibility and
resolve on our part as voters. Farrington trustees have a fiduciary
responsibility to pursue the best possible agreement. If they are willing
to accept the current terms, they should be willing to accept a deal that
avoids handing over land to Civico for housing and septic infrastructure.

I still think we should delineate the wetlands before committing any public
money, but I agree that it is unlikely to change the best course of action
in this instance, which is to reject the deal. *However, the fact that we
even have this uncertainty around wetlands does speak to the inadequacies
of how the process has been handled and the problem with keeping the public
in the dark.*

This is what happens when private entities with significant interests are
allowed to operate with the advantages of both public and private
processes. A public-private partnership doesn’t mean the “public” part
begins only when it’s time to approve the check. Negotiations shouldn’t
happen entirely behind closed doors, only for the public to be asked to
rubber-stamp decisions that have already been made without meaningful
opportunity for input.
-- 
The LincolnTalk mailing list.
To post, send mail to [email protected].
Browse the archives at https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/.
Change your subscription settings at 
https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.

Reply via email to