My memory of this is foggy at best. And probably from a few versions
back. It should be easy to test, though. That said, even if it does
work, I'd only use it for debugging. Looping on the frame is a
friendlier way to let director "breathe".
Does anyone know if this is true? If I have a tight repeat loop, and
want to give the system a chance to take care of business without
leaving the loop, can I just insert periodic updateStage commands?
Are there other, maybe better, commands that will do that?
-Phil
Cole Tierney wrote:
I could be wrong, but I seem to recall that inserting an updatestage
in a repeat loop would allow the loop to be aborted via <command> "."
or escape.
--
Cole
[To remove yourself from this list, or to change to digest mode, go
to http://www.penworks.com/lingo-l.cgi To post messages to the
list, email [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Problems, email
[EMAIL PROTECTED]). Lingo-L is for learning and helping with
programming Lingo. Thanks!]
--
Cole
[To remove yourself from this list, or to change to digest mode, go to http://www.penworks.com/lingo-l.cgi To post messages to the list, email [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Problems, email [EMAIL PROTECTED]). Lingo-L is for learning and helping with programming Lingo. Thanks!]
