> It's a trivial typo
Including the handlerName in the end statement is optional.
It can 'legally' say anything or nothing
Buzz is right. Anything after the "end" is essentially a comment.
I don't know if this has changed recently, but you used to not even need the "end" statement. An "on something" was sufficient to terminate the preceding handler.
Of course, that may not be good programming practice. In fact, I haven't knowingly done it, so I don't even know if it's still true. Handlers will still compile in MX without the end statement, so I assume they will still run.
I'm sure that they still will.
Flakey movie everywhere would break! :)
-Buzz
Cordially,
Kerry Thompson
[To remove yourself from this list, or to change to digest mode, go to http://www.penworks.com/lingo-l.cgi To post messages to the list, email [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Problems, email [EMAIL PROTECTED]). Lingo-L is for learning and helping with programming Lingo. Thanks!]
[To remove yourself from this list, or to change to digest mode, go to http://www.penworks.com/lingo-l.cgi To post messages to the list, email [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Problems, email [EMAIL PROTECTED]). Lingo-L is for learning and helping with programming Lingo. Thanks!]
